• Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 years ago

    The speaker pro tempore, which is the official title, can only recess the House, adjourn the chamber and recognize speaker nominations.

    I don’t see allocating office space on that list.

  • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s funny because this is the best they’ve got. Forcing someone to change their secondary office while they’re away at a funeral. Real inconvenience to the minority leader’s staff. Make America Great Again!

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        2 years ago

        But hey, it’s all her fault, so let’s kick her out of her office

        She was supposed to move out 10 months ago. She still has her normal office with every other House Rep in another building.

        So no, it’s not her office.

        You’re very opinionated for not reading the article you posted tho

        • Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          No… she wasn’t.

          It is her office, or at least it was.

          There are a number of unlisted offices that can be assigned. It is customary to allow a Speaker to retain one of these if they leave that role.

          Maybe you’re the one that should do some actual research?

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            or at least it was

            Right it was…

            Then, it wasn’t.

            She doesn’t get to keep it indefinitely, and 10 months seems long enough to move out.

            How much longer did you want them to wait?

            It is customary to allow a Speaker to retain one of these if they leave that role.

            If that’s true, I googled and can only see Pelosi’s recent claims:

            Well, now there’s a new ex-speaker…

            How many ex-speakers get an office in the Capitol Building?

            Do you think McCarthy and Pelosi should share?

            Do we take someone else’s office so they can both have one?

            Just take two seconds and think about it

            • Drusas@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              There are multiple offices. No one is sharing.

              You really don’t know what you’re talking about. It is a long-standing tradition for the former speaker to maintain an office after their term. Pelosi allowed the speaker before her to maintain an office, for example.

              This is just being done out of spite. Petty nonsense.

              • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                2 years ago

                Mate, we got our representation capped because we ran out of space…

                There’s not infinite office space in the Capitol Building, that’s why House office are in an adjoing building.

                It’s not rocket appliances

                • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Mate, we got our representation capped because we ran out of space…

                  BS. Representation got capped because capping it benefited those in power.

                  It’s easy to allocate more representative to more seats, it’s easy to allocate more office space to more representatives - even if it’s not necessarily in the same building.

                  This issue has come up in a multitude of nations, and everyone has managed to solve this puzzle - and you expect people to believe that “the greatest nation on earth” can’t do it, because there’s apparently a finite amount of fucking office space in America??

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Another example of how Republicans gain power and immediately try to do stuff then worry if theyre allowed.

    While Dems get power and spend years deciding if they can do something before trying, and sometimes it still gets shut down and by then they’ve wasted too much time.

    I wish Dems tried as hard as Republicans. When only one sides does stuff like this, it makes a fight pretty lopsided. Because Dems have to spend all their time undoing what republicans just did.

    It puts us constantly on the defensive and why we’ve been slowly drifting to the right for decades now.

    • Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You think that the Democrats not changing the locks on office doors out of spite makes them weak?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        No, I think Pelosi saying her replacement got the person she replaced getting an extra 30 days longer than she’s had is kind of pointless, and that extra 30 days would only be if he kept the office up to his resignation…

        She’s had the extra office for 10 months now…

        That’s more than enough time to move out.

        It’s nowhere close to the most important issue right now, but it is a legitimate point that she should have been out long ago.

  • mrcleanup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like the one overriding tenet of the Republican party used to be party loyalty, but now they are all convinced that means the party should be loyal to it’s members, not the other way around. So while now the party can’t even hold a speaker and is fulll of infighting, you still see these petty anti-loyalty attacks like this.

    I’d feel like it was more cutting if they weren’t constantly attacking each other as well.