You’re not wrong to question this. “Gun Violence Archive” labels any shooting (as in literally any time a gun goes off) on school property a “school shooting”. Some teacher ices themself in the parking lot? School shooting. Some gang kids blast each other in the yard at 1am? School shooting. Someone pops off a negligent discharge that doesn’t hit anyone? School shooting.
CNN has tweaked this formula by only including times someone besides the shooter actually got shot, so a bit better than usual but still a useless number that we can’t use to make informed decisions.
it’s bad data like this is the reason most people ignore these bullshit headlines.
Sounds like you have an agenda to protect your own gun fetish and are ignoring or twisting data that doesn’t suit your own needs. A quick review of your postings and your talking about ammunition calibers confirms it. I think putting your gun fetish above the lives of children is one of the most unmanly things I have ever seen. But you do you, tough guy.
Sounds like you have an agenda to protect your own gun fetish and are ignoring or twisting data that doesn’t suit your own needs. A quick review of your postings and your talking about ammunition calibers confirms it. I think putting your gun fetish above the lives of children is one of the most pathetic and unmanly things I have ever seen. But you do you, tough guy. I bet you have a picture of yourself holding a gun somewhere in your bedroom, don’t you.
So I provide proof that the data is bad and misconstrued…and the best you can do is make personal attacks?
Which drops your complaints about the data right into the trash where they belong.
Except it doesn’t. Literally provided two random links from the GVA that are labeled AS school shootings…
You really need to think again about doing the hard things to protect your community instead of putting your own ego first.
Like making sure minorities aren’t lacking in force multipliers? And not wanting to strip them of their right to protect themselves?
One of those hard things is maybe not being such a gun nut when our oversized gun ownership patterns lead to oversized gun violence problems.
Yea we really don’t have a gun problem, we have a societal one. Which trying to remove guns from people is just going to disarm the law abiding ones and allow the criminals and gov/police to have the force.
Get off your arse, grow up ( I see you like to talk about video game cards as well) and get to work.
Lol you really went through my profile a ton their chief. I have been in my career for nearly 2 decades. Am the lead architect at global IT security company. Video games are what childish now? Lol
You might have kids someday and by then it’ll be too late to clean up your manchild-made mess.
You’re literally talking to someone with children.
78? Really? What are we qualifying, “school” as THESE days???
Sarcasm, if that wasn’t implied.
You’re not wrong to question this. “Gun Violence Archive” labels any shooting (as in literally any time a gun goes off) on school property a “school shooting”. Some teacher ices themself in the parking lot? School shooting. Some gang kids blast each other in the yard at 1am? School shooting. Someone pops off a negligent discharge that doesn’t hit anyone? School shooting.
CNN has tweaked this formula by only including times someone besides the shooter actually got shot, so a bit better than usual but still a useless number that we can’t use to make informed decisions.
I know you’re kidding but…
And this
https://www.wtok.com/2024/12/03/mcc-campus-police-investigate-tuesday-morning-shooting/
But yea totally a school shooting… it’s bad data like this is the reason most people ignore these bullshit headlines.
Sounds like you have an agenda to protect your own gun fetish and are ignoring or twisting data that doesn’t suit your own needs. A quick review of your postings and your talking about ammunition calibers confirms it. I think putting your gun fetish above the lives of children is one of the most unmanly things I have ever seen. But you do you, tough guy.
Here’s the raw data of all shootings in the US. https://www.gunviolencearchive.org
And here’s an article that talks about reviewing that data https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081
I hope you have kids someday.
So I provide proof that the data is bad and misconstrued…and the best you can do is make personal attacks?
That’s literally where I got the data from champ.
Which again, reviews the data in a biased way…
Except it doesn’t. Literally provided two random links from the GVA that are labeled AS school shootings…
Like making sure minorities aren’t lacking in force multipliers? And not wanting to strip them of their right to protect themselves?
Yea we really don’t have a gun problem, we have a societal one. Which trying to remove guns from people is just going to disarm the law abiding ones and allow the criminals and gov/police to have the force.
Lol you really went through my profile a ton their chief. I have been in my career for nearly 2 decades. Am the lead architect at global IT security company. Video games are what childish now? Lol
You’re literally talking to someone with children.