It’s all made from our data, anyway, so it should be ours to use as we want

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Imaginary property has always been a tricky concept, but the law always ends up just protecting the large corporations at the expense of the people who actually create things. I assume the end result here will be large corporations getting royalties from AI model usage or measures put in place to prevent generating content infringing on their imaginary properties and everyone else can get fucked.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s like what happened with Spotify. The artists and the labels were unhappy with the copyright infringement of music happening with Napster, Limewire, Kazaa, etc. They wanted the music model to be the same “buy an album from a record store” model that they knew and had worked for decades. But, users liked digital music and not having to buy a whole album for just one song, etc.

      Spotify’s solution was easy: cut the record labels in. Let them invest and then any profits Spotify generated were shared with them. This made the record labels happy because they got money from their investment, even though their “buy an album” business model was now gone. It was ok for big artists because they had the power to negotiate with the labels and get something out of the deal. But, it absolutely screwed the small artists because now Spotify gives them essentially nothing.

      I just hope that the law that nothing created by an LLM is copyrightable proves to be enough of a speed bump to slow things down.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s also one of the few places that have lossless audio files available for download. I’m a big fan of Bandcamp. I like having all my music local.