Whelp, here we go again

    • stallmer@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interest rates hikes stopped the free money, so companies need profit.

      I’d argue they don’t need $500 million when they already make $400 million, but I’m just a lowly peasant.

      tl;dr: capitalism

      • JCPhoenix@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially with video. Reddit was easy-ish to leave – I haven’t left entirely – since it’s just a link aggregator and glorified forums. That’s nothing new to the Internet. And Twitter was easy to replace with Mastodon.

        But hosting video? That’s a tough one to replicate. I know there are some other platforms out there, but I can’t imagine any could really take on YouTube, due to space and bandwidth considerations.

        So yeah, I think YouTube has us all by the balls. And they know it.

  • daveyeah@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mmmm, gotta love that enshittification strategy every big tech company is working on right now.

  • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Recently found this gem: https://adnauseam.io/

    It’s an ad blocker that only hides ads and clicks them for you in the background, which means you waste advertiser’s money, support creators, can’t get flagged for ad blocking as easily, and they can’t build a proper profile against your ad activity since it’s all noise. Haven’t installed it yet, but this might be the push I needed.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This might be an acceptable sollution, but what happens on the other side of the ad? If something maliciously is being spreaded, the click might have to happen in an isolated form from the rest of the system or the browser.

    • itsmect@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The question is: How much data about me and my browser does clicking on the ads leak? I’m using libre wolf with additional hardening, including noscript, and I suspect that clicking on ads will not even register with the ad company?

  • that_one_guy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did all these tech companies just get together and decide to fuck us over around the same time? Seriously, what is going on with all these companies rolling out hugely unpopular new rules/changes all on one another’s heels?

    • Mars@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The end of 0% interest means “business” no longer have access to free money. So now they want benefits, and growth but without the spending.

      Also we skipped a tech bubble crash around 2008, so these corpos deaths are more than overdue.

      The cicle as Doctorow says in his enshification tesis is:

      1.- be good to your users, spending tons of that VC and 0% interest loan free money.

      2.- be shit to your users, be good to your clients (add buyers, business that use your platform to do business)

      3.- be shit to everyone. Squeeze the platform and get every last dime of value as profit.

      Once you are in 3 there is no coming back. But these corporations have pulling the ladder behind them using an extra decade of dominant position to try to stop the cicle.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    And what are the consequences of “strikes”? Will you delete my Google account, including my email, and also screw up my Android phone and my kids Chromebook?

    It’s scary to realize that Google has me by the balls here. They can screw me in so many ways, and screw my family members as well. I’d rather have my bank credentials stolen than my email credentials, at least I can get real customer service from the bank, I can even go to a physical location and speak face-to-face with someone who can help me. Google wont give me customer support, and my email account is the closest thing to an identity I have for most businesses I interact with.

    It takes a lot of work to avoid Google. Yes, there are alternatives, but in D&D terms, avoiding Google is like a -2 to all stats for your entire life, and not something we can expect the general population to do.

    All this shows the need for anti-trust enforcement. The same company is controlling too much. Bust 'em up!

    • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Moral of the story: create separate account for YouTube that has no high value services or data on it.

      • Chahk@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve seen enough horror stories to know that’s not going to help. They can, and do, associate multiple accounts to same users. Be it by cookies, IP addresses, or dark magic, the end result is the same - they can upend your entire digital life if they want to. r/degoogle better hurry up and migrate to Lemmy.

      • rho50@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue the bigger moral is that you should always own your online identity. You should buy your own domain (@yourname.xyz or something like that) and make your email on that. So if Google bans you, you just switch email providers and keep your address.

        • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been using @fixnum.org and since a few years the alias @wim.land to do exactly this, but that’s just email.

          My app purchases, photo storage, and YouTube account are all entangled in this. I could decouple from Google, but it would be very painful.

    • GravityAce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Spend a weekend degoogling your stuff. There are alternatives for everything now. No regrets

    • jon@lemmy.tf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Article suggests you simply get blocked from watching additional videos. But there’s no info on how that works- is it account based? IP based? Can I wipe my YouTube cookies to bypass a block?

    • pastelsquirrel@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      you don’t need them tbh

      Protonmail and Tutanota are perfectly viable email alternatives, Libretube/NewPipe and Invidious can replace Youtube on Android and Freetube can replace it on your computer (and you don’t need an account for any of them), Aurora Store with an anonymous login can let you update your apps, or if you don’t want to rely on them, you can easily download the latest updates from APKMirror, and there are million open source alternatives to Play Store apps available on F-Droid.

    • somniumx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s the reason I’m hesitant to use a VPN for yt Premium from a cheap country. The lingering thought of losing my Gmail and android access…

  • liminis@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another executive-driven decision by people who clearly don’t use their own product (kinda impressive really when it’s YT).

    I can’t help wonder if they saw an uptick in adblocking as a result of their absurd increases in ad-time recently and somehow thought this was a reasonable solution.

        • Stewie@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its not that hard to fathom when you have worked with these types of people.

          All it was was a numbers meeting, no User Experience folks in the room. They said how much revenue they would increase quarter over quarter, and how much engagement it would drive. Everyone claps, the meeting ends they move forward with the next terrible design decision. Companies no longer take focus group testing seriously for anything.

          • interolivary@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Focus groups and qualitative data are so last season. It’s all Business “Intelligence” -driven bullshit nominally based on poorly defined and even more poorly understood metrics (excuse me, “KPIs”)

    • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I rarely use YouTube, but my nephew (he’s two) was over the other day and we put on some cartoons for him that were in YouTube since my wife and I don’t have Disney plus. I couldn’t BELIEVE how many ads it showed. One five-minute merry melodies cartoon had FOUR SEPARATE ad breaks, the third and fourth of which were both 3+ minutes long if you weren’t paying attention to skip.

      Wtf?! Not even shit ass normal broadcast television has that many commercials.

      • liminis@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Feels like every year corporations rely on the naivety of youth in an attempt to push more and more egregious shit.

        • LemmyAtem@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly right they’re normalizing ads in everything. They’re indoctrinating the youth, who don’t know any better or differently, into just accepting/expecting that all content in all forms comes with ads, and you can’t watch any of it without signing in so they can track you and sell your data.

    • [email protected]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Executives don’t have to watch ads! They’re rich! I wouldn’t be surprised if they all had YT Premium or whatever it is.

  • TrainsAreCool@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally, I’d rather pay for Nebula than YouTube premium. Most of the creators I actively follow are on there anyways, and the few that aren’t (usually the ones with very long videos) I should probably just watch with ads anyways to support them.

    • ErgodicTangle@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I had a similar thought. How fair is nebula to their creators? I heard it was somehow creator owned, but other than that I have no idea how it works.

  • nicerdicer@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone in the Fediverse (I don’t know where and who) posted that you have to add the following filters into U-Block Origin. When done you shouldn’t see any anti-adblock-warnings :

    youtube.com##+js(set,yt.config_.openPopupConfig.supportedPopups.adBlockMessageViewModel,false)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.adBlocksFound,O)
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,ytplayer.config.aras.raw_player_response.adPlacements,[])
    
    youtube.com##+js(set,Object.prototype.hasAllowedlnstreamAd,true)
    

    I might add that I haven’t experienced any anti-adblock-warnings yet, but I added these filters in advance. I might be worth a shot!

  • worfamerryman@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they want me to stop blocking ads, they will need to get rid of ads like this. I get ads like this all the time and it’s completely inappropriate.

    IMG-7171.png

  • ram@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll stop blocked ads when I stop using their service. Not a minute sooner.

  • agitatedpotato@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Twitch couldn’t beat my adblocking, it just taught me how to find and use custom scripts. Shoot your shot YT, I haven’t installed a script for your website yet but now Im gonna have too. Congrats the number of ads im gonna see from you is about to go down.

    • SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s your Twitch solution? Blocking Twitch is considerably more difficult than YouTube, every solution I’ve found breaks after a month or so. Best I can get is have it display a blank screen while ads play, but I still have to wait it out, which isn’t ideal.

      • agitatedpotato@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        pixeltris on github, a search for pixeltris should get you there first result. Everything you need is on that page, including how to instal the script to ublock, im using the vid swap script and TTLOL pro. It’s not perfect but the ads are gone.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, it’s about to become a never ending fight

      Ad blockers vs ad blocker detectors.

      At least untill the lobbyist big companies lobby for laws to start suing people for using ad blockers in “violation” of their tos due to a form of “circumvention measure”

      At least right now, the code is freely available due to the nature of how HTML, JavaScript and CSS works. - this nature is exactly how a government agency got caught leaking SSNs of teachers, and due to the law, couldn’t perform legal action at what they called a “hacking” attempt.

      It feels like its only a matter of time before these shitty companies seek to close that law in order to start calling HTML analysis “hacking”

  • Glide@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ad blocker detection is not new, and other publishers regularly ask viewers to disable ad blockers

    “everyone else is treating their customers like garbage, so they don’y hold it against us”.

    Yes, we can.

    I didn’t block when you had 5 second ads. I didn’t block when you had 15 second ads. I started blocking when you’d play 2+ unskippable 15 second ads back-to-back. I didn’t mind sitting through an ad when I appreciate the service you offered. Now, you’re just being greedy, and I will go to great lengths to damage your bottom line as notably as I can.

  • JillyB@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hot take: this sucks, but YouTube premium is legit. I wish more platforms offered a paid, ad-free way to interact. I don’t feel like figuring out a way around ads but I’m not about to start watching them. So I pay a few bucks a month.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d be more willing to pay if it wasn’t $10/mo (annual cost) for a bunch of stuff I don’t care about. If they had a cheaper option that was just ad-free (maybe $5/mo?), I’d be down for that.

      I also like what Kagi does with their duo plan for 2 users. Some kind of duo plan for YT premium would be nice as well, since I (and many others, I’m sure) don’t have a family of 6 people.

    • popshabang@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind paying for services I use to avoid my data being the payment (like Kagi or Protonmail).

      But I don’t like the idea of paying Google AND having my data farmed.

    • kukkurovaca@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t have any philosophical objection for paying to use a platform I enjoy, but in the case of youtube, they have been so deliberately detrimental to society in terms of platforming fascists that I feel bad about the prospect of paying them, even if much of the money is going to creators I do like who I’m actually watching

    • Scrumpf_Dabogy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same. I hate google, but YouTube pays content creators better than any other platform. And I am 100% on board with any service where I pay a monthly cost instead of being inundated with ads.

    • shufflerofrocks@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s simply a more honest model - you get content, they get money.

      I would love to be able to pay for an ad-free experience for the various websites and services that I browse and use in a straightforward way instead of being leeched for ad-revenue

      • anon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t doubt paying a hundred per month to have an ad-free life.

        no ads on tv or sports, no billboards, no ads on buses. it would be awesome

    • jivandabeastA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I split a family plan with some mates and honestly it’s the way to go. Costs like $3pp a month and the benefit of ad free content, background play, offline, etc. is so worth it

    • Linnce@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also the student version is so cheap and there is so much more content than anything really. YouTube music is awesome too.