Attorney, journalist, and Elon Musk biographer Seth Abramson eviscerated both Elon Musk and his ā€œfanboysā€ who have attempted to use the billionaireā€™s IQ as an indication of his intellectual prowess in a series of messages shared on X Thursday evening and into Friday.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    Ā·
    1 day ago

    SpaceX was the leading private space company before he acquired it - it has actually lost ground to competitors since then but has an extremely passionate team behind it.

    Tesla was the first company to seriously take a swing at automated response with an eye to FSD - theyā€™ve since fallen far behind Waymo and other competitors.

    When Musk worked at PayPal Thiel described him as a crazy risk taker and had him ousted as CEO while he was on two weeks of PTO for his honeymoon.

    Musk is a huge fucking dumbass with enough money to fail horribly over and over.

    • robbinhood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      youā€™re not getting into UPENN being a complete idiot. Whoever started the company, Musk oversaw periods of the growth in SpaceX, Tesla, Paypal etc.

      Musk is (edit: not) the smartest person in the world like he thinks he is. But itā€™s nearly an objective fact that heā€™s not stupid.

      This is such a dumb hill to die on, and more importantly it benefits Musk.

      edit: and as for failed programs, welcome to the world of business. Google, Amazon, Microsoft Apple, etc. constantly launch ideas that donā€™t pan out. Are their leaders and engineers and everyone else dumb because a project failed?

      • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        You are getting into UPenn if your daddy owns an emerald mine and has pseudoslaves to work in it.

        And yes there are a lot a looooottttt of dumb people at google, amazon, Microsoft, and apple.

        • robbinhood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          Evidence he bought his way in?

          Sure, there are a lot of dumb people at those companies. But thatā€™s not the point. Failures donā€™t prove that the leadership or specific individuals are dumb. Plenty of smart people have failed.

          But have fun inadvertently supporting Musk!

                • robbinhood@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  Ā·
                  8 hours ago

                  Consider the 2016 election and the dangers of writing someone off.

                  Initially, the GOP establishment wrote Trump off as a flash in the pan. Heā€™d enjoy an upswing, probably do something really dumb, and either way voters would come to their senses ahead of primary voting.

                  By the time the GOP establishment realized how big a threat trump was, it was too late.

                  Meanwhile, the Clinton campaign was pushing for Trump as GOP nominee, assuming heā€™d be an easy opponent.

                  We know how that turned out.

                  Trump is not Musk, itā€™s not a direct parallel, but it illustrates the dangers of underestimating someone.

                  Everyone deluding themselves into thinking Musk is an idiot (or 100 IQ) are creating conditions favorable to Musk.

                  (I wouldnā€™t be surprised if Musk is of above average intelligence but not a true genius).

                  • throwback3090@lemmy.nz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    Ā·
                    5 hours ago

                    The article literally says ā€œ110ā€ which is indeed above average. Furthermore, I donā€™t think anyone is underestimating Elon at this point: he built a cult of personality over twenty years that last to this day (smaller than it was a decade ago, but still there) and he bought the presidency.

                    He can do all those things and not be generally smart. His skill, like trumpā€™s, is lying in a distracting way. Neither of them is likely to ever invent a new thing or necessarily even be good at anything else. But they donā€™t need to, society values distracting liars above most everything else.

      • Seleni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        And everyone there said it was because they had a dedicated team distracting Musk from the real work. He is, in fact, very dumb.