data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce670/ce670bbd0b9f952e29df8198f6100dce29cafa1d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46069/460692bda71b4646fdb0a688218881341e90297a" alt=""
You cannot reason a man out of a position he did not reason himself into.
If youāre looking at a guyās resume and it includes graduating from UPENN and getting admitted into Stanford, then launching/guiding/acquiring multiple successful companies and youāre then concluding ānah this guy aināt smartā or āiām not sure if heās smartā itās a position you reached not through logic/reason.
The author is taking a shot in the dark on Muskās IQ and what the author wants it to be. 110 is normie. Isaacson, a very respected biographer, claims Muskās SAT was 1400, which would have put him somewhere around ~93 percentile. I want to see proof of that score, but Iād guess Muskā IQ is around 125-130 and around 95-97 percentile.
Trying to boil Muskās success down simply to lying is vastly underestimating him and playing in his favor.
lol yeah thatās not happening.
The potential host country could decline not to host the President and thatās about it. Countries can do that right now and I wouldnāt blame him, although I doubt Trump will be traveling much.