• Carmakazi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    They don’t have infinite agents. If they start sending one or two dozen agents to arrest one person, rather than the 2-6 they are sending now, that means they will be making less arrests overall.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Given that this would lead to slightly less arrests but significantly more deaths, I’m not sure how this would be considered a win.

      • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago
        1. It would lead to significantly less arrests if they needed double or triple the agents to conduct them “safely”.
        2. More people will die only if agents or their victims start shooting on general principle. In either case, that’s a backslide that isn’t really a consequence of putting more agents on one person.
        • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          More people will die only if agents or their victims start shooting on general principle

          What do you think is going to happen when dozens of agents start raiding homes without a warrant?