LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agoDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comexternal-linkmessage-square59linkfedilinkarrow-up1395arrow-down113
arrow-up1382arrow-down1external-linkDo you like (AI) clocks?clocks.brianmoore.comLegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 days agomessage-square59linkfedilink
minus-squareNeatNit@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up58·2 days agoThe last one, Kimi K2, has been consistently good as long as I’ve been looking at it. That’s pretty impressive. The rest are hilarious!
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 days agoBy far the best, but still off. These three were loaded in the same order as i post them:
minus-squareSlurpingPus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoI dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
minus-squarehuppakee@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 hours agoCartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’: (The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
minus-squareSlurpingPus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 hours agoThat one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven. This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here: This is also impressive:
minus-squareL3ft_F13ld!@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·2 days agoDeepseek has a recognisable clock now and then, too. They both mix up the current time, though.
minus-squareHazzard@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 days agoHaha, I found myself thinking the same thing, and then caught myself, realizing all the other LLMs on this page had lowered the bar immensely for what I’m considering impressive.
minus-squareEnkrod@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up11·2 days agoI thought the same and then Kimi K2 came up with a clock that has two 12 and no 11…
The last one, Kimi K2, has been consistently good as long as I’ve been looking at it. That’s pretty impressive.
The rest are hilarious!
By far the best, but still off. These three were loaded in the same order as i post them:
I dig the square clock, and am now sad that the numbers can’t be put into the corners on a real clock. Unless they’re shifted from the usual position.
Cartier found a work around quite some time ago and maybe they weren’t even the first to design a square ‘clock’:
(The roman numerals are nice, but notice the ‘circle’ between the numerals and the hands, almost like the circle from the ai)
That one is pretty good, though the Roman numerals are rather busy and uneven.
This one is closer, though now I have to wonder if all non-square rectangular clocks have an old-timey whiff for me, or it’s just the border here:
This is also impressive:
Deepseek has a recognisable clock now and then, too. They both mix up the current time, though.
Haha, I found myself thinking the same thing, and then caught myself, realizing all the other LLMs on this page had lowered the bar immensely for what I’m considering impressive.
I thought the same and then Kimi K2 came up with a clock that has two 12 and no 11…