Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, happy Pride :3)
new yorker profile on moldbug (archive)
(still reading)
I wish the author had asked more follow-up questions to push back on this psychotic little imp (ā¦easier said than doneā¦?). Still thereās plenty of anecdotes which make Yarvin look pathetic (or just pitiable at best)
šļø
I wish Moldy a very āMay you and you alone experience the consequences of your beliefsā
ā¦really?
I mean he accurately predicted the kind of dystopian shit Peter Thiel would do with a morally indefensible amount of money, so thatās something.
this is the one who pinged me to see if i could tell her about using Urbit a while back
It brings moi le grand ennui to peruse the excessively florid and terminally gallicistic language of this higly self-esteemed publication elevating the persÅna of urbane wordliness M. /jaŹvÉĢ/ is purposefully cultivating. The fustian pomp the reader is treated to gives off an air of arrogance-born naĆÆvetĆ©āmuch as if the erudite hack composing the presented profile of our very good friend were oblivious to the genteel PR sheās lending the man of the hour.
For real though, itās yet another example of liberal old media platforming a repugnant fascist bozo by playing along with their intellectual academic act, fully falling for the āevil Albert Camusā charade. These profile pieces mistake a subtle undertone of contempt for actually effective interrogation or criticism of the subjectās philosophy. Moldbugās ideas barely have the philosophical depth of a villain from a young adult novel. The criticism of the slimy fascistās neofeudal fantasies and his supportersā implementation of them amounts to no more than a literary raising of eyebrows. In the name of respectable bipartisan stiff-upper-lip propriety itās beyond the pale to call Curtis Yarvinās ideology the puerile parody of high school libertarianism it is. A veneer of eloquence for chuds to point at and say ābehold, not all nazis are stupid: this guy knows words!ā
Curtis Yarvin is just an internet age Julius Evola for the type of people who are somehow also impressed by Julius Evola.
Quality sneer!
@froztbyte
They should have just had Isaac Chotiner interview him to destruction.