• FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Funnily enough, it shows the localised amount.

      For me in France it shows 50k€ to 69k€, so $58k to $80k at current exchange rates

      It just confirms that this is USA only haha

      Btw glassdoor sucks. Forces you to have an account and register work shit

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You can’t just look at the exchange rate. You have to look at cost and standard of living.

        Someone in the US making 100k is not doing as well as someone in France making 70k€

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        80k plus all of society’s trappings of France. Dude, it’s not even a comparison. Worker’s rights, healthcare, public transit, safety, security…

      • thundermoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Listed salaries are almost always what the employee pays, not what it costs the company. In the US, this includes the payroll tax, and cost of “benefits,” like healthcare and unemployment insurance, and is referred to as the burdened rate. This is separate from the income tax the employee has to pay to the government, mind you.

        The burdened rate for most employees at the companies I’ve worked for in the US is like 20-50% higher than the salary paid. Not sure exactly how it works in France, but I do know there’s a pretty complex payroll tax companies have to pay. I think it’s something like 40% at the salary you quoted.

        • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Plus you have to add in the amortized cost of legal, HR, etc for employees.

          Not a big deal for 1-2 employees, but as you scale you need support employees

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And a 80k$ salary in France amounts to around 125k$ cost for the employer. So 170k$ isn’t that much - I actually know French developers and network engineers that make similar money. The French ITsec architect I interviewed last year would have cost me (converted) around 150k$.

        So 170k$ is absolutely not out of the normal range here.

        Talking about France: The French government could start to properly support matrix.org as they use it for tChap. The same goes for Germany with the “Behördenmessenger”

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Just looked on that link for the UK. The average is listed as £63k, which is $85k.

      So you’re not exactly disproving the point that that type of high salary is a US thing.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You can’t at all compare unless you reference cost and standard of living. I’ve managed and hired people in multiple countries. It’s not as simple as salary X exchange rate.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I hate that people treat the US like a country. It’s bad for statistics.

            The cost of living in New Jersey is 50% higher than Alabama, for example, using the site you linked. Averages across the US are near meaningless.

            Since I’m talking about tech jobs, we should compare to states with lots of tech jobs, and we might get a better comparison.

            • Patch@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Sure, but that applies to the UK too. London has a higher cost of living than Los Angeles; averages being averages, this is weighed against lots of cheaper places to live (with massive unemployment and stagnated economics).