cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/14277007
DeepL:
āĆuĆerst beunruhigend und unethischā: Neue Vorschriften erlauben es Ćrzten der Veteranenbehƶrde, Demokraten und unverheiratete Veteranen die Behandlung zu verweigern.
Das Ministerium für Veteranenangelegenheiten erklƤrt, die Ćnderungen seien eine Reaktion auf eine Verordnung von Trump zum āSchutz von Frauenā.
wtf is the problem with unmarried veterans? this country redefines dumb every day
Itās not unmarried specifically, just marital status.
Probably a way from Republicans to allow them to not treat gay Vets if they arenāt married to their partner or something.
Come on. Marital status? This is an attack on queer vets bar none. They just gave them blanket permission to deny someone based on āwhether they have a wife or not,ā which is complete nonsense.
Itās clearly just easier to do this and allow the VA to deny benefits to anyone and everyone who isnt straight than to outright say āyou can deny care to gay and trans vetsā and maybe miss out on harming lesbian vets by accident.
Marital status covers any non-traditional relationship, and allows complete discretion to the fascist who controls your health to determine whether you meet the standards. Horrific. Iām glad you pointed it out.
Edit: and shame on me for not reading the article first
So yeah, explicitly to harm queer vets almost exclusively
My now wife and I lived together for 10 years before we got married. A lot of pearl clutchers had a problem with that. I am guessing that is what they are referring to. Not single people, but unmarried cohabitants.
i just canāt imagine living life being that obsessed with other peopleās relationships/orientations that have absolutely no impact on my life
Fucking same, what the hell??
I interpret it not as married or unmarried, but the gender theyāre married to, though maybe that wouldnāt stand in court due to roundabout discrimination, I dunno.
According to SCOTUS, it is defacto sex discrimination