• WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    A hard truth is that if you see an executive pushing return to office, you know one of two things about them. One of the following is true.

    1. They are terrible at finance and don’t understand the sunk-cost fallacy. They have to keep using that building they bought; they’ve spent so much on it and simply can’t bring themselves to sell it.

    2. They’re a sexual molester. They’re someone that uses the power of their position to coerce sex out of their employees. Fucking their employees is their primary motivation for not retiring early right now. You can’t coerce your secretary to give you a blowjob over Zoom.

    That’s really it. They’re either bad at business or they’re a sexual predator. If you see an executive pushing return to office, be sure to ask them which one of these they are. Because they’re definitely one or the other.

        • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          As well as being a sexual monster. A lot of tradition is built around reinforcement of sexist gender roles.

        • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago
          1. Remote didn’t work as well for the company.
          2. Remote didn’t work as well for any number of people at that company.
            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              We have work from home, i have gone to the office twice this year. But it is true it didn’t work for everyone. Some left because of isolation factor, some fired because without anyone watching they just could not self motivate. In some case in-office meetings are way more productive, and you get those moments when a coworker overhears your convo and chimes in with something relevent that you would never have connection on in WFH

              • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                While there are a few that work better in an office, the overwhelming majority work better at home. Why should we force everyone to suffer for the handful of folks who can’t self-motivate at home? We don’t bend over backwards to cater to people who say, have auditory issues that make working in a crowded open-plan office debilitating. We tell those folks to go die in a fire if they can’t handle an office environment. Plenty of people can’t work in an office, but that was never been seen as an argument to get rid of offices.

    • mister_flibble@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly I think your first point is just a subset of something larger and even more basic - “we’ve always done it this way. Change is scawwy. Different bad. Are you implying I was wrong before?” Etc.