• Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 minutes ago

      i remember her trying to pander to the Bernie crowd after he “lost” the primaries in 2016. it was the first time I heard of her and some articles were treating it as if she was going to take Bernie’s torch.

      She was right when she was talking about Bernie’s healthcare and socialism liteish, but it was more of a broken clock

      so, she’s a complete grifter, trying to get ahead without any principles.

      • KingJalopy @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 minutes ago

        she’s a complete grifter politician, trying to get ahead without any principles.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Just like with Putin’s stooges, the grovelling and the self humiliation is the point.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      When I look at her eyes in a photo or video, I see the kind of evil where as she squeezed the life out of a kitten she would not laugh, cry, or grit her teeth. She would just stare, then tilt her head like a curious alien or Labrador without blinking.

      Please note that I am a fan of both dogs and space, so I am sending zero insults their direction in that comparison. It’s like if I were to compare the number of times Trump shit his pants throughout his first term with the number of times my baby boy – born right after the inauguration – shit his pants over the same interval.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      my theory is they they aren’t “people”.

      they are mouthpieces of an institution. replaceable, and chosen for their bootlicking. if it wasn’t her, they would have chosen another puppet. same thing with CEOs, corporate goons, and most politicians.

      if they were honest and had actual beliefs they’ll have extraordinary resistance, if they even get a chance to speak.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      question who is the smartest invertebrate?

      octopi, or conservatives?

      Octopi can solve puzzles, but conservatives can imitation human words, both spineless.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I just repeated this to a table of 6 and got nothing but blank stares.

      5 of them genuinely thought we found WMDs Iraq/Afghanistan

      One had no idea what I was talking about and thought the war was entirely about the world trade centers.

      I am surrounded by morons.

      • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I was talking to a guy and he said “who was that politician that used to wear a bunch of makeup?”.

        “I’m not sure” I said

        “The one with the eyeliner”

        “Oh you mean J.d Vance? The vice president?”

        “He’s the vice president?”

        Physically had to stop myself from facepalming.

        Right after he started talking about Greta Thunberg. He said “people that don’t know anything about politics shouldn’t get involved”.

        I wish I could make this stuff up.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      10 hours ago

      We elected Biden on mostly anti-Trump sentiment then forgot and elected Trump again 4 years later. I think 20 years is more than enough time.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Whatever shadow of a hope I had that the people of this country would not gobble up low-effort lies about Iran just had this comment appear from the shadows and shiv it in the fucking liver.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          I’ll bet fewer people will fall for Trump’s lies than fell for GWB’s, but not because we learned from Iraq. This war is really unpopular with MAGA. It’s for the wrong reasons, but I don’t think most will flip to Trump on this one.

          Democrats might be interesting to watch. They are mostly cucked to Israel, but they won’t want to pass on the opportunity to snipe at Trump.

    • 0li0li@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t think the majority of Americans bought the DMW bullshit back then either, but the war happened anyways because those in power wanted/let it happen. The people didn’t have a say in it.

      • tauisgod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t know about a majority, but I lived through that as a young adult and I’d believe it if at least 51% of the US population bought the Iraq WMD crap. Colin Powell was a well respected military leader and political moderate and he cashed in all of his influence to sell the lies to Congress and the population.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How I Edged Myself For 20 Years: A U.S. Lawmakers Heroic Effort To Convince Themselves Everyday That Iran Is Two Weeks Away From A Nuke

    “This memoir is beautiful, it shows a secular side to fanatical devotion you don’t often see.”

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        No that is two weeks

        Edit wait, I am not sure who is trolling who anymore, you trolling me, me trolling you, you trolling Trump, Trump trolling me, us trolling Trump?

        hahaha I genuinely lost the plot on that being the punchline thank you for punching it for me

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Sounds like Congress needs to ask her why she lied to them in the first place. Alas, they will not, because she is already playing the “Fake News” card.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I think a lot of people are going to be surprised…

      Personally, I don’t know why, because it’s obvious Russia needs Iran for Ukraine.

      But Putin isn’t going to let trump attack Iran.

      And it’s already causing the people Putin makes support trump, start going against him.

      I don’t want to link an actual tucker Carlson video, so here’s some people talking about his interview with Rafael Cruz:

      https://youtu.be/yQEd-ECAwDU?t=1140

      It tucker is breaking from trump over this, a lot more rightwing media is going to as well

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Her evidence was a photo of an alleged nuclear facility with an arrow and “nukular missiles” written on with black sharpie. She also noted the MS-13 lettering stamped on top of one of the buildings.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It was a real photo, Iran likes to write “Nukular missiles” in giant black letters next to their hospitals.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I did not know that. Thanks for educating me. I withdraw my objection to the evidence, although their connection to MS-13 was already damning for Iran.

    • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Depends what you mean by fusion energy, but fairly recently ignition has been achieved and breakeven surpassed.

      In December 2022, the National Ignition Facility, or NIF, an inertial confinement facility, reached Q = 1.54 with a 3.15 MJ output from a 2.05 MJ laser heating. NIF achieved ignition seven times. The highest gain as of 2025 of Q = 4.13 yielded 8.6 MJ from 2.08 MJ of laser energy.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_energy_gain_factor

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        While that quote alone, and the NIF’s results are very impressive and promising…

        The beginning of that wiki page says you actually have to hit more like a Q of 5 before you get something that can power its own heat managment and other operating systems as well, to stand a chance at being sustainable.

        The other big, missing piece of context is:

        The NIF facility’s impressive results come from shooting about 200 lasers at a tiny capsule, which heats it so fast it becomes a plasma and undergoes fusion, and then the energy released is captured.

        But… this is not like a toroidal reactor, that, if it got high enough Q, could just keep running and producing energy in net.

        This is more like firing an artillery canon that needs to be carefully and manually reloaded.

        It is not a continuous, on going process… the position of the capsule must be perfectly aligned to where all the lasers convergently aim at, and its a burst, with a reload time.

        That and the capsule (technically a ‘hohlraum’) itself is… making one is a massively intensive and complex process.

        The actual fusion fuel part of the pellet has to be encased in a diamond, and then gold, and it has to be like nano scale perfect.

            • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              But your statement implies it’s some impossible feat, and not simply a lack of funding, and maybe it is impossible, but how would we know if we never properly fund it? Moreover, you associated it with a propaganda reference, and I’m not even sure what you’re getting at there.

              • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                just saying it was an example of one of those things that are always a free years in the future. like flying cars, which as a society, gave up on