• PonyOfWar@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For my country (Germany): Catching a draft. Basically people believe that a light breeze from an open window will make you ill.

    • minorsecond@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have a similar one here in the US. People think if you go outside when it’s too cold, you’ll get sick.

      • Perfide@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not completely baseless. You can’t get sick from the cold itself, but lower core body temp does weaken your immune system until you warm up, making it easier for you to get sick if you do get exposed to something.

        • RaLiChu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The cold, dry air during the winter can also dry out the mucus membranes in the sinuses which can make it easier for pathogens to enter the body. Again, doesn’t make you sick directly but does interfere with your body’s defense mechanisms.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the US, I hear this more when your hair is wet: “Don’t go outside, it’s cold and your hair’s wet, you’ll get sick!”

    • yads@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also Russia and probably most eastern European countries. One of my kids will catch a cold and the first thing my mother or grandmother will ask is if they were somewhere drafty.

  • swnt@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Living near a nuclear plant.

    Little do they know, that they get more than 50x more radiation effect from the natural surroundings and the rocks in earth than from the nuclear plant 🤭 And our body is really capable of dealing with that since the beginning of our evolution (DNA repairs and co).

    https://pages.vassar.edu/ltt/files/2011/04/Screen-shot-2011-04-21-at-1.18.09-AM1.png

    here is a chart showing radiation intensities for various sources of radiation

    • rjh@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      it’s not the background radiation that worries people, it’s the risk of a Fukushima-type incident.

      • max@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And even then, despite the catastrophe it was, it only had 1 death attributed to it.

        • rjh@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          TIL. That’s a good point. 20k deaths due to the earthquake but only 1 due to the power plant itself.

  • hoodlem@hoodlem.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Many people think sharks are dangerous, but shark attacks are accidents in which sharks mistake humans for seals. Sharks are actually in more danger from us.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sharks.

    More people die due to things like selfies, falling out of your bed, tipped vending machines and heck, even balloons, then to a shark.

    Just because something can kill you doesnt mean it will, more often than not, it actually wont.

    • Kafanzi Max. Praetor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Here there might be a confusion between danger, and statistics.

      all those examples are about events or things that are far more frequent than be near a shark

      if the average person could be close to a shark as many time in life than leaving a bed, be close to something that can flip, or to people taking selfies, statistics might be very different

  • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In South Korea most fans have timers so they’re not left on overnight, because people think it’ll kill you if you do leave it on.
    This belief wasn’t helped by medical examiners putting “death by fan” on the death certificates of suicide victims to help the dead save face and spare the families the embarrassment of a “cowardly death” for a few decades.

      • kryptonicus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        There have been three accidents related to nuclear power generation, Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukashima. There were a total of 33 deaths attributed to those three incidents (32 from Chernobyl and 1 from Fukashima.)

        There are 58 deaths per terawatt-hour attributed to coal alone, mostly due to air pollution.

        I’d say that nuclear power is very close to completely harmless in comparison. Certainly in contrast to its perception among the general public.

    • kool_newt@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s just the radioactive waste we don’t know what to do with and becoming a military or terrorist target parts that are dangerous.

      • NattyNatty2x4@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, we’ve known what to do with the waste for decades. Put it in cans, fill the can with cement, coat the can in cement, put the cans in a facility that is protected from geological events like earthquakes, and periodically check the cans/facility. In the US for example, The Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository was being made before political pressure shut it down.

        The waste issue is and always will be one of political pressure and ignorance by the masses, not an actual logistical issue

  • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Huntsman spiders

    They are large, and they gallop across your ceiling like demented gazelles, chasing down cockroaches.

    However, they’re nonaggressive to humans, you’d have to seriously harrass one to provoke it into biting you, and the worst they could do to you is a beesting-like bite.

    They’re also all named Kevin.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, as an arachnophobe, Kevin better stay out of my house or have a faster draw than I do or he’s toast. Castle doctrine applies to spiders that large lmao.

  • popemichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who are dependent on opiates and opioids.

    Some people who are in a lot of pain legitimately need the medicine in order to have a normal life. It doesn’t make us high, it makes us ‘normal’ because we actually require the medicine to bring us to normal levels of activity.

    Just because someone is physically dependent on the medicine, does not make them an addict too

    Most of us would rather never take another pill in our lives if we were suddenly healed.

    • sauerkraus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re dependent on the drug that’s an addiction. You may feel that your addiction is more justified than others, and that’s ok. Humans have been using drugs for thousands of years both recreationally and medicinally.

      • popemichael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not true. There’s a difference between addiction and dependence medically.

        You don’t say that a person on insulin is an addict. You don’t say that a person on heart medicine is an addict. We shouldn’t say that a person on opiates are addicts.

        Addicts take the medicine without a medical need. Dependent people need to take the medicine in order to live a normal life.