A missile struck the Strinda commercial ship in the Red Sea, U.S. officials said. Israel said it opened a second station for screening aid at the Kerem Shalom crossing.
Yes they are aiming militants, never said theyāre consciously targeting the populace, just appalled at their indifference towards civilian deaths as āacceptableā.
The IDF/war council is seemingly a-okay if they have to kill 10, 50, 200+ civilians to get at Hamas mid-level commanders - is that okay with you?
Well if you agree that itās a question of how far youāre willing to move the slider, itās a question of empathy. But when you say āaimed at the populaceā that implies you believe theyāre using Hamas as an excuse to kill innocent civilians.
Do you honestly believe Israel would not prefer Hamas to assemble somewhere in the desert away from any civilians so they can take all of them out with a single bomb? Do you believe the Israelis would be sad if Hamas surrendered?
Again, the displayed indifference towards civilian suffering is the core issue. Declaring the south as a āsafe zoneā pre-ceasefire was a moral move (with disasterous humanitarian results), but now the safe areas are capricious defined and arenāt static,
Regarding the āone bomb in the desertā question? Any other year, yes Iām sure theyād prefer that. But Bibi was already in serious legal trouble before Oct.7 and is openly deferring that issue until after the Hamas war. Keeping the conflict open, progressing slowly, or unresolved buys him time to find a way to stay out of jail.
Is this an excuse for wanton murder of Gazans? You tell me? Certain elements of the coalition have openly made statements that at best call for displacement of Palestinians. Cutting off fuel, food, and water to a region under blockade, while those people are displaced and simultaneously refusing to allow aid in is ghoulish.
Yes they are aiming militants, never said theyāre consciously targeting the populace, just appalled at their indifference towards civilian deaths as āacceptableā.
The IDF/war council is seemingly a-okay if they have to kill 10, 50, 200+ civilians to get at Hamas mid-level commanders - is that okay with you?
Well if you agree that itās a question of how far youāre willing to move the slider, itās a question of empathy. But when you say āaimed at the populaceā that implies you believe theyāre using Hamas as an excuse to kill innocent civilians.
Do you honestly believe Israel would not prefer Hamas to assemble somewhere in the desert away from any civilians so they can take all of them out with a single bomb? Do you believe the Israelis would be sad if Hamas surrendered?
Again, the displayed indifference towards civilian suffering is the core issue. Declaring the south as a āsafe zoneā pre-ceasefire was a moral move (with disasterous humanitarian results), but now the safe areas are capricious defined and arenāt static,
Regarding the āone bomb in the desertā question? Any other year, yes Iām sure theyād prefer that. But Bibi was already in serious legal trouble before Oct.7 and is openly deferring that issue until after the Hamas war. Keeping the conflict open, progressing slowly, or unresolved buys him time to find a way to stay out of jail.
Is this an excuse for wanton murder of Gazans? You tell me? Certain elements of the coalition have openly made statements that at best call for displacement of Palestinians. Cutting off fuel, food, and water to a region under blockade, while those people are displaced and simultaneously refusing to allow aid in is ghoulish.