So like I’ve been vaguely paying attention to them finding larger, farther, and more red-shifted galaxies. I’ve been suspecting the universe is a black hole for a while now.
What if: information CAN survive the event horizon… but only if it hits the accretion disk from the side at the perfect angle to spiral in. That’s why JWST is finding galaxies that are larger, older, and much more common than we’d anticipated -they’re extra-universal objects.
What if dark energy is a function of hawking radiation… and the expansion of our universe is driven by primordial black holes? Maybe hawking radiation is the black hole equalizing the same anti-matter/matter asymmetry we’ve observed in our universe.
I’m sure someone formally educated on the subject can debunk those ideas tho.
The hardest to understand thing about physics is that for those of us who got off on an earlier offramp it absolutely feels like this is an entirely different category of thing than a statics or dynamics class. Like, it feels like a lot when you go from “here’s how ballistics, tension, and springs work” to “this is how electricity flows through metal and what forces make it do so”. Then eventually, people who majored in that shit wind up doing this shit.
So like in your opinion, tldr, do you think it’s explicitly impossible for light to survive entering a black hole such that it could reproduce an image of whatever it reflected off?
If the observer is inside the event horizon of the black hole, they’ll see the light as normal. There’s nothing special about the event horizon for the observer or the ray of light.
If the observer is outside of the black hole, they won’t ever see the light.
I’m talking as an inside observer. Like what if spaghettification = red shift and the “too large, too old, to developed” galaxies like MoM-z14 detected by JWST are actually from outside our universe’s event horizon.
It’s definitely possible in the case of a real black hole. I think it’s unlikely to apply to the model we’re talking about - the spaghettification would have to happen outside the event horizon, and that only applies to very small black holes.
Light that falls over the edge of the event horizon cannot get out again
I’m talking as an inside observer. Like what if spaghettification = red shift and the “too large, too old, to developed” galaxies like MoM-z14 detected by JWST are actually from outside our universe’s event horizon.
Here’s a far out idea based on absolutely nothing:
What if all of the information imprinted on the event horizon of a black hole is duplicated and becomes the stuff that creates a new universe inside of a black hole.
Like. Everything that ever hits the event horizon are the pieces from which a new universe is built
Bro what if… *hits blunt* What if the whole universe was like… like a quantum multiverse and shit- like, if we were supersymmetrically entangled without own spacetime strings
it’s certainly an interesting theory, it makes me wonder, if that actually were the case, how much time has passed outside of the black hole? Like is the universe space significantly younger outside of the black hole? Is matter less finite? It really makes the mind wander
deleted by creator
My intellect level is dipshit: do you know a good source for me to study and learn about this?
I would suggest nasa.gov
deleted by creator
Copied from another user in this thread
So like I’ve been vaguely paying attention to them finding larger, farther, and more red-shifted galaxies. I’ve been suspecting the universe is a black hole for a while now.
What if: information CAN survive the event horizon… but only if it hits the accretion disk from the side at the perfect angle to spiral in. That’s why JWST is finding galaxies that are larger, older, and much more common than we’d anticipated -they’re extra-universal objects.
What if dark energy is a function of hawking radiation… and the expansion of our universe is driven by primordial black holes? Maybe hawking radiation is the black hole equalizing the same anti-matter/matter asymmetry we’ve observed in our universe.
I’m sure someone formally educated on the subject can debunk those ideas tho.
deleted by creator
De sitter space and anti de sitter space took me a while to grok as it relates to all this stuff
deleted by creator
Grok remains a perfectly cromulent word, imo.
Even if everything Elon touches isn’t
The hardest to understand thing about physics is that for those of us who got off on an earlier offramp it absolutely feels like this is an entirely different category of thing than a statics or dynamics class. Like, it feels like a lot when you go from “here’s how ballistics, tension, and springs work” to “this is how electricity flows through metal and what forces make it do so”. Then eventually, people who majored in that shit wind up doing this shit.
deleted by creator
Love PBS Space time!
So like in your opinion, tldr, do you think it’s explicitly impossible for light to survive entering a black hole such that it could reproduce an image of whatever it reflected off?
From which point of view?
If the observer is inside the event horizon of the black hole, they’ll see the light as normal. There’s nothing special about the event horizon for the observer or the ray of light.
If the observer is outside of the black hole, they won’t ever see the light.
I’m talking as an inside observer. Like what if spaghettification = red shift and the “too large, too old, to developed” galaxies like MoM-z14 detected by JWST are actually from outside our universe’s event horizon.
It’s definitely possible in the case of a real black hole. I think it’s unlikely to apply to the model we’re talking about - the spaghettification would have to happen outside the event horizon, and that only applies to very small black holes.
deleted by creator
I’m talking as an inside observer. Like what if spaghettification = red shift and the “too large, too old, to developed” galaxies like MoM-z14 detected by JWST are actually from outside our universe’s event horizon.
deleted by creator
Pshhh I figured this out when I was 17 the first time I took psychedelics.
It explains subjective experiences?
deleted by creator
Sounds a lot like pseudoscience unless I am missing something major
deleted by creator
Here’s a far out idea based on absolutely nothing:
What if all of the information imprinted on the event horizon of a black hole is duplicated and becomes the stuff that creates a new universe inside of a black hole.
Like. Everything that ever hits the event horizon are the pieces from which a new universe is built
Bro what if… *hits blunt* What if the whole universe was like… like a quantum multiverse and shit- like, if we were supersymmetrically entangled without own spacetime strings
Hear me out:
it’s certainly an interesting theory, it makes me wonder, if that actually were the case, how much time has passed outside of the black hole? Like is
the universespace significantly younger outside of the black hole? Is matter less finite? It really makes the mind wanderdeleted by creator
Right but outside of the black hole, outside of it’s gravity well, time moves faster. So how much time would have passed outside the black hole?
deleted by creator
Seems like every cool physics theory turns out this way. Physics: it exists for the masses to misinterpret