Our AI-generated future is going to be fantastic.

Archive link, so you don’t have to visit Substack: https://archive.is/hJIWk

    • 0xtero@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah sorry - edited OP and added archive link, so no one needs to hit substack servers.

      • Mothra@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Pardon my ignorance but I’m OOTL- why is substack a bad thing? ( I didn’t know of its existence before this post)

        • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          1 year ago

          They recently refused to remove pro-Nazi content from their site, claiming that doing so doesn’t make the problem go away so therefore there’s no point in trying.

          • tjhart85@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            24
            ·
            1 year ago

            For me, it’s the refusal to demontize them that’s particularly bad. I can understand free speech absolutists (in theory anyways, in practice you’ll find that they VERY rarely actually are and will happily censor people they disagree with like LGBTQIA+ or sex work content), but that doesn’t mean you need to actively be funding them!

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              This is a really good point. I’m sure they’re using a payment provider, so it might be worth it to go to them directly in the same way people have gone to advertisers to get Fox News hosts fired. The argument could be made that they’re funding domestic terrorism by white nationalists. The payment provider might be much less willing to take on that risk in the name of “free speech”.