• 0xb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh boy.

    Everything everywhere all at once.

    And I did like it to a point but absolutely don’t see it as the phenomenon that was presented as. I saw it as a good film that lacked nuance and subtlety, instead of leaving stuff for the viewer to discern it rather just loudly announcing with bright signs ‘This is profound, we are very artistic’. While the quirkiness and comedy were fun, it always felt to me like if marvel had suddenly decided to make an indie film, with all the good and bad that carried.

    Obviously I was shunned by everybody else so what the hell do I know lol.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think that Hollywood wanted that film to be really popular because they were tired of Marvel movies being all over the box offices.

      I agree that it was…like okay, but I think most of the Marvel movies were like okay.

    • ndru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Thank youuuuuu. Totally agree. It was a fun contemporary king fu movie with some great visual effects. Everyone I spoke to about it thought it was a groundbreaking masterpiece.

    • pfjarschel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Same! For me, it was an ok action/fighting movie. There is a message there, but the message itself is not as deep as people want it to be, and nothing new. It was just OK.

  • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Barbie.

    I’m a woman and a feminist. I’m a fan of Greta, and of everyone they cast in that movie.

    I was bored for most of it. The parts that were meant to be poignant, I thought completely missed the mark. It was a waste of an opportunity.

    I don’t understand the hype. Margot is a gem, one of our exports I’m actually impressed by, and I think her unfailing charm won a lot of people over to this. I think most of us would happily watch Margot read the phone book.

    But I found the movie to be dull and shallow in its attempts for depth.

    I feel bad because most of my female friends really hold it up as something I don’t think it is. I keep my mouth shut.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      It had some good parts, but the ending kinda felt like everyone just boxing up their genders again as the status quo instead of being a society that valued people for more than just their genitals. I kept waiting for the part where they realized equality was what they should strive for to help lead the human world in the best direction.

      The queer-coded Allen felt a bit on the nose for 2023, too. I liked parts of it, but it felt very…20th-century feminist and straight to appeal to larger audiences.

      I think the part with Margot and the grandmotherly lady at the bus stop was my favorite part. Peaceful, sweet, and exactly where the movie felt like it was heading in a good direction (in addition to the heaven and tearoom scenes). The musical parts were a great reminder of the movies from long ago, and also a great step in the right direction.

    • josefo@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I was in the same page as you, but I think I understood it at the very end, literally at the last scene. I understood that the message is something along the lines of “women should be allowed to be just women, without anything remarkable about them”. It kinda just tries to make that point, right? Women are just people. They are not objects, nor super heroes. They don’t need to be special.

      The main goal of feminism is equality right? Well, women today are asked to be a lot of things that men are not asked to, to be exceptional, to break their chains, and fight. To be better than they are now, to change and fight back. And all that is exhausting, sometimes you just need to go to your ginecologist, not change the world. And that brings you happiness and fulfillment. Leave women to be whatever they want to be, don’t put on them YOUR expectations, let them be free. Stop telling women how they should live their lives, let them pick whatever they want. They are just humans. Men are allowed to be regular humans with flaws and virtue, women are not.

      I think that’s the message, or I completely missed the point there lol. I don’t think it’s not deep. You could argue that maybe it’s a message a little dangerous, sure. A very individualistic message, even alienating, but what would you expect from something financed by capitalists. The revolution will not be televised. Personally, I found it a little refreshing, sometimes it feels like we are changing one social mandate for another, but in the end we cannot choose freely anyways, just obey. I gave me one or two thing to think about.

      • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Those messages came through to a degree (good write up by the way) but to my mind they didn’t go far enough. Then the comedy was so light touch too.

        It all just felt like a first draft of something that might have been hilarious, entertaining and thought provoking. But didn’t land any of those things well. So I thought, couldn’t it have picked one of the 3 and done then well?

        When the credits rolled I just said ‘k’. Because I didn’t really take anything away from it. Even without the hype for months, my expectation was built more by the cast and director. So I was just disappointed. I wasn’t even entertained.

        • josefo@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Oh, I’m totally with you there, there were about 2 or 3 jokes that I enjoyed, and every thing else was kinda bland. I think I was overhyped.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m a man but have the same take, excited about everyone involved and the themes and the style, but it just kind of limped its way through the stereotypical story with a lot of preaching at the audience. My wife actively hated it and didn’t even finish it, bailing out when the mom went on her rant about how unfair everything is which was true but executed really badly.

      I did really enjoy Kate’s Crazy Barbie or whatever. If the rest of the film had that kind of nuance and comedic timing it would have been fantastic.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m not sure if was meant to be “deep”, I think it was meant to be a bit satirical and a lot of tongue in cheek. I don’t think they were setting out to make a masterpiece, but a sharp take on mid life crisis and societys demands of women, including the monotinization of their escapism driven by corporate (men) stooges.

      I’m not sure what opportunity was missed in a movie about capitalism utopia as portrayed by glamour dolls.

  • tws@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Superhero films

    I’m a massive fan of suspending my disbelief in a fantastic fantasy world, still have no interest in superhero films.

    They’re so incredibly predictable, I can get the same from the trailer as watching the film.

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I want a marvel movie where the entire movie is just an insurance adjuster’s life in superhero NYC where the entire city gets destroyed every 1.5 years due to alien sea turtles and two men punching each other through buildings and such.

      The insurance premiums would be insane. The insurance agencies would have to be massive and get constantly bailed out. People would deliberately try and live in the ugliest places they could to avoid the carnage (and later lawsuits).

      • tws@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Maybe the superheroes should be required to get public liability insurance to cover the impact of their adventures.

        Or

        Maybe this accounts for their popularity, the greatest fantasy is a world not defined by capitalist considerations!

  • Hikermick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The series Schitt’s Creek is like this. It’s not knee slapping hilarious about it just memorable characters and subtle humor

  • Ryzen11v@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Lord of the Rings 2 and 3 I found to be quite meh.

    I really loved Fellowship of the Ring, the other two sequels were just 90% large-scale NPC army battles that got really old really fast.

    Also Rashomon (1950) sucks.

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    The new Dune is so artificially slow and full of itself. The old one with Picard and Mr. Mayor is so much more watchable for me and I genuinely love it. The new Blade Runner did the same thing, being slow for the sake of being slow does not make it deep or philosophical it just makes it boring

    • Worx@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I felt the complete opposite. I’ve read all the Frank Herbert books multiple times and loved how in-depth they were. Dune part one was much better than part two because the first part spent so long setting up the universe and exploring different factions which I found really cool. Part two was like “well, all the hard work is done now so we can just have all of the action”. No! The action is the worst part! I’d much rather 70% world building 30% plot.

      As an aside, I also like how the technology was very rarely explained. Just the shields and the stillsuits I think. It makes it feel so much more natural and realistic because these characters live all their lives with weird floaty lamps and ornithopters and lazbeams, so why would they explain any of it to us?

    • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I feel the same way, having just left Dune 2 an hour ago. It feels every bit a long as its four hour run time.

      Oddly, I enjoy Lawrence of Arabia despite it also having long shots of desert.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Tropic Thunder.

    I liked the RDJ gimmick, but the rest was really dumb. Everyone else likes it but i even bought a copy based on terrific reviews and ended up giving it away. So it was pricy too.

    • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      This is definitely going to be an unpopular opinion. I salute you for your bravery! Now get ready to embrace downvote hell.

      Edit: a few hours later, I guess I was wrong.

  • drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Your favourite movie is absolute garbage and is only liked by tasteless philistines. The plot is obvious, the actors are hamming it, the direction is bland, and everything looks fake and pompous.

    My favourite movie, on the other hand, is a masterpiece with a clever scenario, excellent and subtle acting, a work of genius by the director and the technical team. And one of the best soundtracks, too (it’s Universal Soldier)

  • hakase@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The Big Lebowski. It’s got a perfect combination of plodding, boring plot and insufferably obnoxious characters that makes it a physically painful watching experience.

    It genuinely confuses me that people like The Fifth Element. The plot is just batshit insane, and it suffers from obnoxious character syndrome just as much as Lebowski does.

    Thor: Ragnarok is by far the worst Thor movie, and is in the top 3 worst Marvel movies. It’s an absolute travesty of a film that not only ruined the character of the Hulk to the point where he had to be effectively erased as a character going forward, but turned Thor himself into a Gimli-esque laughingstock, and is also just neither funny nor entertaining. But, then again, neither is anything I’ve seen by Taika. Edit: Actually, that’s not quite true. Here’s a really hot take for y’all: Love and Thunder is the good Taika Thor movie. It wasn’t great, but it was miles better than Ragnarok.

    On that note, any movie (or show) where the entire second arc/B-plot is a useless side quest that either fails or does nothing but waste the audience’s time. See, for example: Thor Ragnarok, The Last Jedi, Andor.

    Tarantino movies are really overrated, but I wouldn’t say I dislike them.

    Edit: Ooh, thought of another one. O Brother Where Art Thou would have been an enjoyable movie if it hadn’t tried to act like it’s an adaptation of the Odyssey. As someone who’s pretty familiar with Homer, it just infuriates me every time I try to watch it.

    Edit2: Someone mentioned Skyfall, which has now reminded me that as a huge James Bond fan, I hate all of Craig’s Bond films (except Casino Royale) with a fiery passion, to the extent that I don’t even consider them James Bond movies (they’re “James Bourne” movies at best), and I don’t ever include them in my rankings of the series.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Both The Big Lebowski and O Brother Where Art Thou are directed by Joel and Ethan Coen and and it sounds like you might not like their style.

      I’m upvoting you for sharing your opinion even though I disagree 100% as all three movies you mentioned are fantastic at what they set out to do, but not for everyone.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      That was a hard upvote. Tarantino is my favorite director. I’ve only been lukewarm on one of his movies. And even then, I didn’t dislike it. Respect your opinion though.

      Also, my two favorite movies are Pulp Fiction and The Fifth Element.

      Question: How do you feel about Edgar Wright? Specifically Hot Fuzz and Baby Driver if you’ve seen those.

    • Kushan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I reject most of what you’ve said, but I’m still up voting because I agree entirely about the big lebowski.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The Big Lebowski may be more fun if you’re already into stoner comedies and classic cinema, because it’s one parodying the other. The cliche in detective novels was a private eye chasing wrong leads but advancing the plot regardless.

      but I’ve never seen a Simon Pegg film that I enjoyed (which have been two so far: Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz).

      … are you maybe just immune to the meta? Like, if you don’t enjoy Airplane!, I am gonna say this is a you problem.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I liked Airplane!, so I don’t think it’s that I just dislike meta movies. I really enjoyed Tucker and Dale vs. Evil, for example, but maybe that’s more of a subversion movie than a meta movie? I also enjoy movies like Spaceballs, but maybe that’s more of a spoof? I dunno…

        I think I get the intention of Lebowski, and I’ve often enjoyed the “protag accidentally bumbling his way into success” trope otherwise, so maybe it’s the stoner movie side of things that messes it up for me, since I only rarely enjoy stoner movies.

        I think in both cases, Simon Pegg and Lebowski, it might be the characters that get under my skin most.

        Either way, I appreciate your help in trying to figure this out.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m sorry, you’re trolling MCU/super hero movie fans if you think Thor Ragnarok is worse than Thor 2. Your opinion is opinion, but it’s factually incorrect and I think You’re here to troll/hate on the director who you call out by name.

      • hakase@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Funnily enough, I watched Thor 2 two weeks ago during my most recent Marvel watch-through, and other than a slightly lackluster final battle, I literally can’t understand what people have against it. Great characterization and development for Loki, Thor, Odin, and Jane, a truly crushing moment with the death of Thor’s mom, Christopher Eccleston’s excellent villain, and a great cliff-hanger ending with Loki replacing Odin - I feel like I’m taking crazy pills here. It’s not amazing, but it’s definitely in the top half of Marvel movies. Much better than crap like Iron Man 3 and Captain Marvel.

        If you’re this bothered by someone having a different opinion than yours, maybe a thread about people disliking popular movies isn’t for you.

        • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Downvote away fella, funny you bring up my being “bothered by someone having a different opinion” when I didn’t bother down voting you.

          Also you’re casting shade on an accomplished directors entire body of work pretty freely there, might it be that you have some bias against a certain jene c’est quoi that you’d rather not have “shoved down your throat”?

          You might be taking crazy pills, or you’re just unhappy with progression of society and digging into the trenches defending more traditionally themed movies, despite their not even close to mediocrity.

          • hakase@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Downvote away fella, funny you bring up my being “bothered by someone having a different opinion” when I didn’t bother down voting you.

            I downvoted you because your comment didn’t contribute productively to the thread, which, I remind you, is about unpopular opinions about movies.

            You downvoted me because you’re mad about my opinion and offended that I downvoted you. I’m sure you can figure out the difference.

            might it be that you have some bias against a certain jene c’est quoi that you’d rather not have “shoved down your throat”?

            I have no idea what this is supposed to mean, unless you’re implying that I’m somehow bigoted for not liking Taika’s work, which I wasn’t aware was considered especially progressive. Also, it’s je ne sais quoi.

            You might be taking crazy pills, or you’re just unhappy with progression of society and digging into the trenches defending more traditionally themed movies, despite their not even close to mediocrity.

            Doing a whole lotta unfounded theorycrafting there bucko. Maybe I just don’t like the director that you seem strangely attached to, and maybe you should go touch some grass instead of getting oddly worked up at a stranger on the internet over literally nothing.

            Also, I don’t see this conversation becoming productive from here, so I likely won’t respond any further.

    • Nate@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      A truly unpopular opinion.

      Honestly for me I don’t think it’s necessarily about anything really happening in the movie, it’s just cute watching 2 robots fall in love n save the planet and everything. Also WALL-E is just a silly lil guy you can’t not root for him

    • ooli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right. Plus I find it quite offensive on the fat people on the station

  • ooli@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    the Sixt sense… It is so boring, nothing happend. And when something happend it make no sense. I was not spoiled, and i was so underwhelmed by the reveal… At least it explained why nothing was making sense prior

  • Kben@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The fifth element,i really cant understand its popularity.Plus it makes me want to punch Chris tucker in the throat.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it depends on your age.

      I saw it at the theaters. It was just a silly fun popcorn movie with good visuals and Bruce was very popular.

      The movie itself under a modern lens just isn’t very good.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not for movies but for books

    The Alchemist

    Winter’s Bone

    Absolutely hate them. I hate the characters. I hate hate hate hate.

    • ooli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The only clever thing from “the Alchemist” was the end reveal. And it was invented by J.L.Borges in the “story of the two dreamers” And the story itself come from the arabian night, as akwnoleded by Borges.

      Of course Cohello never akwnoledge both of his source.