• NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    The article says it’s also not a search warrant, which backs up their claim saying they can enter because they aren’t searching.

    Which is stupid.

    But if it’s not a search warrant, and they start doing this, I wonder if there’s some way to protect yourself by requiring finding you in the house to constitute a search?

    Like what if you attached a bookshelf to your bedroom door. And you had to move a book to access the handle?

    That’s a search?

    Maybe that’s a way to try to continue legally protecting yourself within their illegal entry? Or something like that anyway.

    • EpeeGnome@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      Problem with that idea is that they don’t actually care about any of the technicalities one way or the other, they just tossed out a somewhat plausible sounding “justification” to have something to point to. Their idiots will believe the justification regardless, and everyone else’s time can be wasted arguing about it.

    • MotoAsh@piefed.socialBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      They’re already ignoring law. Stop looking for loopholes and start looking for safe shooting positions.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Pretty sure a ‘hidden’ room is a good spot to shoot from if that’s the decision you’re going to make.

        It will make it more obvious they are about to enter it somehow.

        edit: Also boobytraps would probably be effective at that point as well.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.socialBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          Just remember, an annoyed invader that has no external challenge can just set your house on fire and smoke you out, boobytraps or no.

            • MotoAsh@piefed.socialBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              Not necessarily ICE, but 1. I wouldn’t put it past them. and 2. If even a lame-ass civil war largely in name only erupts, you bet your ass fascist pieces of shit would torch someone’s house before they put themselves in actual proved danger.