“Every previous president would have ended it by now.”

“Biden literally couldn’t do worse.”

  • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    Your solution to losing is to now bandwagon with “the lesser of two evils”? Why wouldn’t you abandon that party entirely? There’s more than two choices.

    They’ll kill and take away the rights of people who aren’t you though…yay…

    To top it off, you go on to bash those who think that’s not a good choice

    The irony.

    But don’t listen to me, I’m the stupid one.

    • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      At least you recognize it.

      There’s two choices. Protests votes in the general election in the system we have today are at best no votes, but are often just votes for the other candidate. Your moral high ground is nothing and smugly voting third party doesn’t actually DO anything right now.

      • Shake747@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        How else would you go about removing the two parties from power?

        I don’t think continuing to support the party with a vote is really the answer here.

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Easy. By eliminating the worse party and transforming the existing one. Parties have already vanished in our system in the past; see the Whigs.If you’re older than 22-years-old you recognize just how much progress Dems have made in the past 15 or so years. So continue promoting progressive candidates in Dems while ensuring GOP go the way of the Whigs. Start advocating for campaign finance / election reform as your primary voting concern and that you’ll donate to anyone who pushes this.

          Things take time but a protest vote inevitably leads to the worst evil prevailing.

        • JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          If you think that “protest votes” have any chance of removing the two parties from power, you’re naive. If it were that easy, it would have already happened as people have been voting and advocating for third party votes for generations. The way to actually affect change is to engage vociferously in primaries and lower level offices to get outside voices in at a level to actually change things - specifically abandoning FPTP voting and getting third party candidates in local offices (and eventually ditch the electoral college). Even if you somehow magically convinced everyone that “would like to vote for someone other than D’s and R’s” to actually do so in a national election, having a candidate that adequately represented enough people’s beliefs to win is a statistical impossibility.
          The fascists/Christian Nationalists have been methodically working towards their goals for decades; to think that you have any chance of overthrowing the Democratic or Republican party in this election is beyond laughable.

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s more than two choices the same way there’s more than two choices for calling a coin. You can call a side. You can call for the edges. You can call that it balances diagonally. You can even call for a unicorn to magically appear over one of the sides. The chances are so slim that you might as well have chosen no side at all, but it could happen, and it is a choice.

      Personally, anyone that says there are more than two parties has no idea how statistics and/or voting works, or they don’t really care about the outcome.