Never pay another DVD rewind fee again! Compatible with all disc formats: DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+R, DVD+RW, CDR, CDRW, Audio CD, VCD. Multi-region, code-free rewinder capable of rewinding all 6 region DVD’s including RCE/REA encoded discs

  • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m wondering if we’re at the stage where the joke is missed because the average age of users never experienced the CD.

    • VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m of the age where I can remember having a load of rewritable cds and DVDs plus those things that supposedly cleared up scratches now those were a scam too.

      • otacon239@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        9 months ago

        Usually the home versions were scams, but there were better quality ones out there that would remove just a little bit of the top layer, making a smooth finish again. Although deep scratches obviously couldn’t be repaired in this case.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Sometimes it did! I tried it on a disc that was so messed up, I figured out couldn’t make it work any less, and wouldn’t you know, it worked for the first time in a long time. Other times, not so lucky.

            • Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 months ago

              Most toothpaste is slightly abrasive so depending on the scratches it can definitely work as a polish. I’d always steal my dad’s special glass polish and it was basically like toothpaste

              • theneverfox@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I learned how to polish glass fiber… It’s not any different from polishing anything else, except the “sandpaper” is smoother than normal paper

                Toothpaste is an abrasive… Partner it up with finer and finer abrasives and you could get a cd clearer than new

      • Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I had one that was a hand crank thing. It actually worked pretty well. Whenever I thought that was it for my Diablo II CD, I would run it though there and Presto: good as new.

        My Xbox 1 also had this weird thing where it sounded like it was fucking eating the CD too. If it got too grumpy we would use the crank and boom: back to teabagging people in Halo.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      Doesn’t the fediverse userbase trend towards being made up of millennials? I’m on the older end of gen Z myself and grew up with CDs and DVDs, so I imagine most people here are familiar with the technology.

      • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m on the younger end of gen z and still know what the are, never actually use them but we have lots. I feel most of us know what old stuff like CDs are because of the Internet tho.

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gaming disks still exist, also music CD, even vinilos have a comeback.

  • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    9 months ago

    Last year I spent $787 on Blockbuster charges for not rewinding my DVD’s.

    With this I could make money rewinding other people’s DVDs for a small fee.

  • Ginger666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 months ago

    I HATE THIS PRODUCT!!!

    IT DOES NOT REWIND SACDS!!!

    MY PINK FLOYD ANIMALS SACD IS STUCK ON PIGS ON THE WING PART 2 HALLLLP

    • kshade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      They used to make ones that can do both sides at once, but they were too complicated, expensive and basically immediately outdated when dual layer DVDs came around.

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Reminded me of the scratch removal services some game stores offered

      • itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yup. The data was encoded on the back of the plastic disc. So long as the “label” surface wasn’t scratched you can resurface the bottom.

        • andrew@radiation.party
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          It was more common for commercial discs and some consumer discs to have the data layer sandwiched between the bottom surface and label layer, especially later in cd/dvd’s heyday, to prevent tiny scratches on the label or sharpie marks from destroying bits in the data layer.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There was still a wear layer below the data layer which could be resurfaced. So the services worked.

            Commonly it worked by removing some material from the bottom wear layer to remove the damaged bits, so it didn’t work forever. You would eventually run out of material to remove and trying to repair it would result in a catastrophic failure of the media.

            Writable disks however, not so good.

  • son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of course it’s a scam. You can easily rewind DVDS in your DVD player. You don’t need a separate device.

    • Zerush@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      I always used a pen in the hole and turning it backwards by hand, also works.

  • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    One of the grocery stores in my town also had video rental. When they started carrying DVDs, they put the “Be kind, Rewind” stickers on the cases.

  • Batting1000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know about rewind. As a child of the 90’s, you lay that sticky label on there, let your older sibling press the freshly burned disc onto it, and bam, you have a homemade mix CD before Lars can shut down Napster.

    As a Metallica fan, I do repent my Napster days, though.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I suspect a few people bought this legitimately. When the CD/DVD revolution happened, a lot of the quattrogenarians spent their entire home video experience inundated with “be kind, rewind” slogans from rental shops. Being fairly frugal and not wanting to pay the extra to have the shop rewind the video for them, they would be obsessed with rewinding a video before returning it. I imagine that some used this unironically to appease their elders into thinking that it was “rewound” before returning rentals. It’s useless, sure, but it would have completed the “rewind” step, preventing the unnecessary (and non-existent) rewind fees for mildly dementia ridden elders during the early DVD era. Just having that extra step would appease their need to do it, and prevent complaints and re-explanations that DVDs don’t need it.

    Just put it on the thing, make it spin backwards for a minute, then package it up. It’s useless to explain that you don’t have to do that because they won’t remember it, and the next time they play a DVD, they’ll just be looking for a way to rewind it again.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is merit to it, mainly in high speed applications. When you got up to 48x and 52x speeds, an imbalance could result in a catastrophic failure of the material and the disk could lose structural integrity… aka it can explode.

      For audio… Not so much. Since audio always ran at 1x speed. Any disk imbalances would be trivial to the ability for the player to read the disk.

      I remember when I converted a bunch of CDs to mp3, the “ripping” program would give errors if it was trying to read too quickly, it would result in those slips and cirps you could hear on some mp3 files. Those were literally read errors from when the data was extracted from the original media… though, it could also be imperfections in the disk, or scratches. I ran mine at… IIRC 4x to ensure there were few, if any, read errors. Sure, it took between 10 and 20 minutes to extract all the tracks from a CD, but I didn’t get any audio issues that were so common in early mp3 files.

      I imagine that if I had this and used it on the disks for a minute before ripping them to mp3, I could have run it at 8-16x or more with no loss in quality.

      For data applications, there’s read checking (CRC) to ensure data integrity. If there’s a read error, the drive will just retry, slowing down as required to ensure the data is consistent. This is why your CD/DVD drive spins up and down while reading data during something like a file copy off of a disk. Eliminating the need to re-read the data can significantly increase the speed of a copy operation.

      The disk shaver did work, it was just marketed poorly. For 1x CD reads, it was generally useless.