The ad was released hours after Trump said that he believes abortion laws should be left to the states, sidestepping the national ban that some of his supporters want.

President Joe Bidenā€™s campaign released its latestĀ abortion ad of the electionĀ hours after formerĀ President Donald Trump saidĀ he believes abortion laws should be left to the states, sidestepping the national ban that some of his supporters want.

The 60-second ad, which first aired Monday on MSNBC, focuses onĀ Amanda Zurawski, a Texas womanĀ who sued the stateĀ after, she said, she almost died from a miscarriage. In the video, Zurawski and her husband, Josh, discuss how they had started buying things for the baby while Amanda was pregnant, including a baby book.

ā€œAt 18 weeks, Amandaā€™s water broke,ā€ the adā€™s text said. ā€œShe had a miscarriage.ā€

As the couple continued to recount memories of the pregnancy, text on the screen read, ā€œBecause Donald Trump killed Roe v. Wade, Amanda was denied standard medical care to prevent infection, an abortion.ā€

Doctors were forced to send Amanda home and three days later, Amanda wound up in the ICU with sepsis, according to the ad.

  • dgmib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    Ā·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The pro-lifers that think there should just be an exceptions when motherā€™s life is at risk need to also hear that the Texas law already has an exemption for when a doctor uses their ā€œreasonable medical judgmentā€ that the life of the mother is at risk or the pregnancy poses ā€œa serious risk of substantial impairment of a major bodily function.ā€

    All pregnancies are a risk to the motherā€™s life, anytime a doctor performs an abortion in Texas they risk losing their license, and possibly even prison time. Which is why we have these case of mothers with unviable pregnancies that arenā€™t terminated until theyā€™re almost dead.

    If you care about life, why on earth would you support a law that takes informed medical decisions away from doctors and their patients to put it in the hands of lawyers and lawmakers?

    • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      Ā·
      8 months ago

      Bruh, Kate Cox, actually got a judge in Texas to agree that she should be able to get an abortion because both her AND her baby were at risk of not surviving. Her baby, unfortunately, wasnā€™t going to live long if it made it to term anyhow, it was going to have a difficult short life full of suffering, and she was at risk of dying if she delivered. She also already had 2 children at home.

      And Ken fucking Paxton, the Texas Attorney General, fucking overturned the judges allowance and Kate Cox ended up having to flee with her husband to a different state to get the procedure instead.

      It was the quintessential ā€œHey, Iā€™m dying, I need Healthcareā€ and the Texas government going ā€œLOL get fucked.ā€ I cannot imagine what her and her husband went through mentally. To know that the government was actively stepping in to prevent anyone from saving that womanā€™s life.

      More people need to see/hear/know about whatā€™s happening in Texas. These ads need to highlight how much worse it really is here after the repeal of RvW (and it was pretty fucking bad before).