• Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What’s even worse, is that there are people dumb enough to think you’ll actually believe them when they try to tell you that both sides are the same thing.

    Vote like lives depend on it. Because many do.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      If the democrats hold “civility” and “precedent” more highly than outlawing a candidate who, by their own admission, would plunge the country into fascism, then democrats are complicit.

      Dog, take a look at what has happened this week alone (under a dem president): arguing in favor of unprecedented levels surveillance to any president, sending billions of dollars to a genocidal regime, the revelation that like 40% of democrats are in favor of mass deportations…

      Fascism is already here. Just because it is being formally codified in Project 2025 doesn’t mean it has yet to arrive. Democrats, and liberalism in general, are unable to stomp fascism.

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        While I agree, it’s still important to vote Democrat just to keep things from getting worse even faster while we drum up support for a better solution.

        • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Na fuck that. Voting Democrat is voting against progression. Progression will be achieved by igniting the masses. You fuel the fire and the new growth is what will grow to the old forest for your grandkids kids who will never know or thank you will live in. Vote Trump and burn the fucker to the ground.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s not enough to just burn it to the ground - the right people need to be behind the fire, or the only people to survive will be the wealthy with all their money and power.

            If we work on spurring the people to rise up, buying time until enough people get on board, we can make real positive change; if we allow capitalism to destroy the country, the working class will die and the upper class will just move somewhere else.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          43
          ·
          8 months ago

          The only logical conclusion to that line of thinking is, 30 years from now, voting for the candidate who supports 5 genocides as opposed to the candidate who supports 10 genocides. It is a liberal and fascistic strategy. Any vote within the American electoral system, which is kabuki theater, does nothing other than to refine capitalism and the regime.

          • jumjummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            29
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I love how unhinged your argument is, essentially boiling down to “Voting is a waste”. Get out of here with that noise. You “both sides are the same” fools are just foreign disinformation agents, or useful idiots.

            Lemmy is absolutely infested with this nonsense.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’ve seen it a lot, yeah. I’m proud of how well Lemmy has pushed back on it.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                We’re not doing good enough. There’s still a LOT of threads where the “both sides, don’t vote” propaganda has taken over.

          • Signtist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Bud, what? We need a revolution, yes, but it takes time to build it up - we’re not going to overthrow the government tomorrow. So, what do we do while we’re building up that support? Keep the country stitched up with the knock-off duct tape that is the democrats. Yes, the entire thing is coming apart at the seams, and pieces are falling off, but it’s better than letting people actively break it further. There will be no revolution if there’s nobody left to rise up.

            • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not only this, but our populace keeps shifting socially leftward. Hence why we have legalized gay marriage and why trans rights are even able to be discussed openly. The dems have been forced to shift their stances from the 90s on these issues bc of their core demographic shifting to the left.

              Take note that lgbt rights, privacy, universal healthcare, and sensible climate change policies are no longer fringe, they are at the forefront of what the youth wants. Dont believe the lie that things will only get worse from here if we compromise on status quo joe.

              The country is changing whether we like it or not. Either the leftward trend of the majority continues and those who wish to be elected fall in line, or we vote for the biggest boot youll ever see in ur lifetime.

              • Jentu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Social acceptance of queer people is falling. Maybe if we’re talking about the prospects of revolution, we shouldn’t wait until social acceptance of queer people is so low that no one wants to work with us to make necessary change. I’m not saying revolution has to happen before this upcoming election since numbers aren’t changing that much (even though falling acceptance is always scary), but “society will generally move leftward” isn’t something that should be trusted or expected.

                From a study of 22,000 adults published march of 2024:

                Support for non-discrimination protections for LGBTQ Americans has dropped four points in the past year, from 80% in 2022 to 76% in 2023.

                Even young Americans, aged 18-29, show a gradual decrease in support for LGBTQ nondiscrimination laws over the last three years, declining from a peak of 83% in 2020 to 75% in 2023.

                Support for same-sex marriage has declined among Americans in the last year, dropping from 69% to 67%.

                • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Call it speculation, but those are minor dips on the whole- any upward trend will come with temporary dips. The strides weve made in queer acceptance since, say, the mid 2000s, are staggering. The dips we notice come as the queer acceptance and gender equality movements have expanded to include fighting for trans folk, as well. We werent capable of even discussing trans rights up until recently, now it is a hot button issue.

                  Meanwhile, the average conservative is not the donald trump monster a lot of us are continuously made to believe in by the media we consume. The conservatives i work with on the daily are very quick to point out that they are accepting of gay ppl under far less conditions than they were even 10 years ago. As in, im not talking about, “not that theres anything wrong with that,” but outright, “such and such coworker whom i hold in high esteem is/was gay,” and then pretending that they were never part of the antigay crowd in the before times in the first place. The overall cultural shift in this country over the past 20 years has been astounding to see. I will grant that those same individuals might still have reservations towards gay adoption, but they do not feel like that is a safe thing to openly talk about.

              • Signtist@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                8 months ago

                I hope you’re right, but I honestly see our current political options as being the government’s response to our own successful pulls toward the left. “You want to force our Dems to support ever more left-leaning ideals? Well, we’ll just push our Conservatives ever further to the right, so you feel compelled to vote even for a moderate democrat to prevent them from getting power!” The government has just as much ability to force our hand as we do on it - or, more likely, even moreso. I believe this election is an example of that.

                • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Mmm, despite what the FUD crowd here on lemmy would have u believe, the dems are not so keen on donnie dump and co. as their adversaries. They want to retain power, too. Dr. Fascismo is a massive threat to that end. On the flip side, biden and the rest of the old guard care little if we want lgbtq rights to be engrained in law, support abortion outright bc they want women to be happy spenders of money, and see climate accountability as a threat to their lobbyist friends only at the far end of that spectrum- otherwise they will vote to placate.

                  Obviously far leftist politics can only come via direct action, but even then democrats are a smaller boot to deal with and should be embraced as the enemy of our enemy.

                  • Signtist@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I think there’s a lot more comradery between politicians across the aisle than they let on publicly. I agree with the final statement, though “embraced” is a far stronger word than I’d pick.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              8 months ago

              You say “build it up”, but what you really mean is “achieve revolution via electoralism” - which has no historical basis. This is liberalism.

              • Signtist@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                8 months ago

                No, I mean literally get the people on board with the idea of having a second American revolution. With guns and everything.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                It’s been achieved several times, and I’m sure you’ll remember it the instant you have an opportunity to talk about this or that elected socialist which the CIA had a hand in deposing.

                From a historical basis, it’s almost more important that countries like America achieve revolution through electoralism, because it would the revolution direct oversight to abolish and reform the machinery that has been used to reverse electoral revolution elsewhere in the world.

                Especially with how much effort goes into trying to rig the system against the possibility, a strong enough electoral victory even for a para-socialist coalition will open the door to exponential electoral capture back from the right.

                Filibuster reform can take use to voting rights law, voting rights law can take use to congressional expansion, congressional expansion can take us to voting system reform and multi-seat districting, those can take us to unabashed leftists running independently or in a proper American Worker’s Party, and with the electoral viability of a solid leftist AWP, the sky is the goddamned limit, but to reach the heavens, you still gotta lay the brickwork down here on earth, and that means ya gotta vote.

                • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  and I’m sure you’ll remember it the instant you have an opportunity to talk about this or that elected socialist which the CIA had a hand in deposing

                  Lol gottem

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                You say “build it up”, but what you really mean is “achieve revolution via electoralism” - which has no historical basis.

                Sure, if you’re completely ignorant of history…

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Man it’s like I can hear how white the people you get your politics from are

            Nobody who actually lives the difference talks like this, get off your high horse.

          • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            ROFL…. I said stupid too when I was a teenager. But not this stupid.

            Thanks for the laugh. I really need this.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The the heritage foundations wishlist for fascism. The heritage foundation is responsible for all of the conservative judges that get “chosen.” They hand a list to Republicans and those are the candidates that are picked from. The heritage foundation is top on my list of “things that really need to die in a fire.”

          Some real “high integrity” content includes:

          Rooting out democrats/liberals from federal positions.

          The previously mentioned banning porn.

          Defunding NOAA and privatizing the national weather service that people literally depend on for their lives. Privatize as in "you no longer get access to life saving weather information unless you pay us.

          Etc…

          Edit: there’s a good list of a few more from @mozz in a comment below that I’ll tack on here:

          slashing U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) funding, dismantling the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security

          Invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807 to deploy the military for domestic law enforcement and directing the DOJ to pursue Trump adversaries

          Create a federally funded “American Academy” that would deliver online courses and grant free degrees that excluded “wokeness or jihadism”. The plan would also be funded by taxing the endowments of major universities

          every state report exactly how many abortions take place within its borders, at what gestational age of the child, for what reason, the mother’s state of residence, and by what method

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      you’ll actually believe them when they try to tell you that both sides are the same thing.

      I mean, look at that last batch of legislation on Ukraine, Israel, Taiwan, and TikTok that got passed through both houses by wide margins. There’s definitely a political consensus on certain issues, particularly when it comes to advantaging American private businesses or pursing certain foreign policy objectives.

      You might get a dispute over whether we should be arming Ukraine against Russia or kicking off a fight between Taiwan and China instead. But there’s near-zero daylight on Israel, and its not hard to see why. Same with the TikTok ban, which US social media companies have been salivating over for months.

      • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ukraine needs to be funded, and the only way dems could get that piece of legislation was to throw in israeli support, but that is not all that bipartisan in congress, only in the streets do i see both conservatives and social liberals both sporting “support Ukraine” stickers. The GOP wanted to pass even more aid to israel that failed.

        Not as sure on Taiwan, but agreed that banning Tik Tok was absolutely bipartisan. Also true that US social media companies mist be salovating over that one, but that is not why it was passed. Tik Tok is being banned bc it enables a foreign adversary to spy on our citizens. This one keeps being framed as a privacy issue, but unlike things like the patriot act, there is actual reason to close Tik Toks back door.