• BorgDrone@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    8 months ago

    (…) the entire purpose and selling point of VPNs, which is to encapsulate incoming and outgoing Internet traffic in an encrypted tunnel and to cloak the user’s IP address.

    No. That is not the entire point of a VPN. That’s just what a few shady companies are claiming to scam uninformed users into paying for a useless service. The entire point of a VPN is to join a private network (i.e. a network that is not part of the Internet) over the public internet, such as connecting to your company network from home. Hence the name ‘virtual private network’.

    There are very little, if any, benefits to using a VPN service to browse the public internet.

    • the_third@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well, for one, using one of those VPN providers has kept DMCA takedown notices away from me or the hosting provider of my seed box. So that is useful.

    • mako@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are very little, if any, benefits to using a VPN service to browse the public internet.

      This is why it’s often best to just avoid the comments completely

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are very little, if any, benefits to using a VPN service to browse the public internet.

      I’ve run into issues multiple times where a site doesn’t load until I turn on my VPN with an endpoint in the EU

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are very little, if any, benefits to using a VPN service to browse the public internet.

      accessing services that are blocked in your region.

      • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        that works, but a regular SOCKS proxy should do. for HTTP even a HTTP proxy. many VPN providers offer them too, btw… may help with mitigating this attack vector.

    • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Come to think of it, why do they even call this use case a VPN? I’d call that a proxy.