• GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    It was a hypothetical. Pick anything you want.

    And anyways you proved my point, the “society” pushed back, ad discarded it, rather than allow it to be poisoned.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No, symbols are just hard to change. Once they have a meaning associated to them, you can’t take the meaning away. A pride flag is symbol, so ot means something. An ok hand gesture doesn’t have much beyond “ok” to it, so it can quickly be taken over and poisoned.

      A drop of poison in a glass will kill you, but a drop in an lake won’t harm anyone.

      • ninpnin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s why the ok sign is still “in most contexts is entirely innocuous and harmless”, even according to the ADL. Because it had, you know, a meaning associated to it

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s fine, detach from the flag and pick something else. It’s the act of repulsion I’m clarifying. If a group chooses, a poisoner has no power, they are discarded.

        “Ok” meant “ok” for many years. Society allowed it to be poisoned and that is lame.