• Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah, equally deep and long injuries with a sharper implement destroy fewer cells (since they have a smaller cross-section), cause less trauma, and are less disruptive to the surrounding tissues. I know it’s unintuitive, but it’s true.

    • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The dull stick is going to gouge your eye out entirely. I have no frame of reference of what would hurt more, but I guess that would be it.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        No a dull stick would probably fuck your eye up, a sharp stick will absolutely destroy your eye.

        • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That entirely depends on how deep the stick goes into your eye - though at some point it won’t matter anyway.

          • Jax@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes if fired the dull stick out of a fucking cannon it would destroy the eye, how many bits of criteria are we going to add to this (what should be anyway) very straightforward analogy?

            • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              There are times when a clean cut hurts less than a crude one. We’re not talking about actual damage done, which wasn’t part of the analogy to begin with.