The article in the Washington post that it pulls all its information from is (Oct 25). So why dredge it back up?

This article is a month old

I will still champion “That’s Not My Name” by Ting Tings. It’s a well-crafted pop song that most people miss the “subtlety” (for lack of a better word) of the message. It’s about a woman wanting to be social, but hating all of the poor flirtation in the pick-up scene.

And I never knew it until I had it on an exercise mix and was able to hyper focus on it while trying to zone out in my cadence run. It usually just glossed by as a chippy beat.

Raisin Bran has more sugar than many “kids” breakfast cereals, so it’s even more hypocritical.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/gabrielle-hanson-defends-white-supremacist-active-club-tennessee-1234851308/

I’d say so, yeah.

Partnering with Luxotica/RayBan to make it look more like normal frames will keep it from being as obvious for one.

As you get into the meat of the article, it has five bolder headlines:

What does the clause say? When has it been used before? Who is talking about it? What are the arguments for and against? What happens next?

Five year loans used to be scandalous twenty years ago. The goal posts always shift.

There Will Be Blood is loosely based on Upton Sinclair’s “Oil”

They also added the lagoon gates, which raise these massive floatation barriers to keep the tide from overwhelming the lagoon.