• 0 Posts
  • 179 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2024

help-circle





  • You’ll actually find rice instructions that say not to rinse the rice if you don’t want to wash away some of the nutritional benefits. I’ve had mixed success with the rinsing, I’ve made near-perfect unrinsed rice and soggy clumpy nastiness from rinsed rice. I think it’s more about controlling the water ratio and the heat. I’m currently on the “boil water, add to rice, and bake” train as I’ve had the most success with this method. However I’m also usually making rice for 60 people at a time and don’t have an industrial rice cooker, you just can’t do the “bring to a boil, simmer, and cover” method with that much rice. Or I can’t anyway.







  • Idk what a child-juicer is, steroids really fuck with development so I don’t recommend that. Not sure what that has to do with anything.

    I’m not asking anything, I’ve only ever stated facts. You’re the one who keeps going out of their way to describe child rape, even though no one in this entire thread said “Stephen Hawking was definitely a child rapist.” No one’s even claiming that he definitely was a pedophile. But he could have been, even without being in the Epstein files, there’s a non-zero chance he was attracted to children. Which is true of every human on Earth.




  • No, there is one definition of pedophile, the second thing you described is called a child rapist. Naturally, the second is also usually the first, but the reverse is not so reliably true. Y’know, that classic square : rhombus :: child rapist : pedophile analogy. Pretty sure it used to be in the SATs.

    I’m not saying he did anything anywhere or that he even was a pedophile, I really don’t care either way. It’s hard to prove and nearly impossible to disprove, since we still don’t know how to read people’s minds, especially dead people. The only horse I’m backing in this race is objective truth. Someone said he couldn’t be a pedophile, which is just so obviously false 🤷‍♂️.