Do you have a public-facing internet-presence? If so, then I’ve heard good things about copyparty.
I’m using Nextcloud for this, but that seems a bit overkill for your usecase.
Edit: they explain how to use a cloudflare tunnel, so no public IP needed, actually.
- this being a functional exe (i still don’t really know if it is)
It’s a simple shell script. That’s why it’s human-readable.
Bonus points for URL shortener.
As long as they don’t ask ChatGPT.
the post is advocating for the murder of people based on their views, not theit actions.
I think that’s the strawman.
TIL Georg Elser was as bad as Hitler. /s
Not a tankie, try again.
So the partisans who killed Mussolini are supposedly just as bad as Mussolini and Georg Elser just as bad as Hitler, or what? /s
Found the “centrist”.
I guess it would be most accurate to say that The US (with no mention of allies) could take Moscow
Yeah, that’s where Isdisagree. Although I’m no military stategist. I simply don’t think that a nuclear power the size of Russia could be conquered that easily without nuclear retaliation.
That there were 100 people with the same idea as Bezos but failed.
That’s just bullshit. Russian’s military (it’s not just Putin - he’s an authoritarian, but he’s not a supreme leader - he has to watch his step very carefully or the next authoritarian will take his place) definetly did have a strategic interest in the black sea. That’s why all that annexation of crimea business started (afaik).
So it’s the Russian government that’s enforcing the nation state’s interest here, definetly not due to the “personal whim” of someone.
Putin can’t afford to be a mad king. He definetly isn’t the only one in the Kremlin who can just disappear people…
I’m not claiming that they’re not effective at defending. I’m arguing that they’re still a tool of imperialism.
Nah, that’s just survivor’s bias talking.
That doesn’t explain why Russia should have any strategic interest in invading Europe, though.
Ok. That makes sense. But wouldn’t it have beenmore accurate to claim that the US (and it’s allies) “could take Moscowin days”?
it is already evident.
I disagree. But I see now that this whole discussion is stupid.
I’ll let you and your motivated reasoning alone.
woosh.jpeg
Where do you get the impression that Russia isn’t a threat?
Having a military that’s in such a supposed desolate state is mutually exclusive to being a threat. That’s like claiming a teenager with a slingshot is a threat to a gang of polige officers with assault rifles.
Ukraine proves that it very much is.
I don’t follow. The invasion of Ukraine had a strategic motivation behind it (so did the annexation of Crimea). What possible strategic benefit would it have for Russia to attack the EU?
That’s like claiming that the US is about to invade Mexico, because of the Iraq war(s).
I’m not sure if I’m using all of those 100% correctly (e.g. “Public facing”). But either use a search engine, or just ask.
What terms do you have in mind that you want to learn about?