They say that’s how the inventor of the machine gun had his eureka!

Very drôle

I could see it as a table with the second column having their murderer in it.

Better?

Haven’t heard that “NK bad!” take yet.

In this particular case it’s more for memability surely.

I recommend the cj the x video on it.

Yes and no.

Ok my last input was a bit lazy hence all the armchair biologists tuning in.

Less and more evolved is definitely a thing when alluding to the complexity of the system and since evolution is incremental time helps.

However you are right that adaptability to the environment is the most important thing when defining the success of your “genetic constitution”.

I guess my point is that we are more likely to have, in our DNA, evolved adaptation to them than they are to have adaptation to circumvent our immunity.

That being said, yes there are inherent risks to getting those out there, I’m just saying our propensity for enjoying fictional doom scenarios might make us overstate the probability of those occurences.

Although, most likely less-evolved hence less-threathening than the current virus and bacterias.

It doesn’t. It’s just overhyped.

Just ignore him he’s too far gone.

Don’t know why you’re being downvoted, Harris isn’t perfect but with Trump on the other side not much is required of her to be the best option.

deleted by creator

What do you mean? The fight against communism is well-known because they don’t recognize the validity of the concept of property, hence natural ennemies to capitalists for sure.

But a lot of the “bourgeoisie” put their capital towards the tyrannical nature of a failing monarchy turning fascist in their methods.

I don’t see how that holds up when historically capitalists have put their power behind the fight against fascism more often than not.

I think his point is when you are far enough on any side of the spectrum, everyone else gets lumped together with the more problematic version of the opposition.

Capitalists aren’t fascists but I wouldn’t be surprised to read an essay from someone on the far-left making that point.

Socialists aren’t communists but you can frequently see this point being made by the far right.

My experience whit those folks is that you can’t extrapolate observations to make conclusions about the past.

So basically they throw away any inductive reasoning that would be detrimental to their pet belief.

My understanding was that this was an hyperbole. I mean what in “not a single man on earth” sounds like it should be taken literally.

“From what I’ve heard” isn’t a very reliable testimony…

As much as I probably ideologically stand with you, let’s not confirmation bias ourselves into a belief we have no evidence for.