

If they do, it will be in protection of proprietary code, at the expense of open source


If they do, it will be in protection of proprietary code, at the expense of open source


In the age of LLM code laundering, I’m not sure any license will protect a project, open source or not


See Goomba Fallacy:
A logical fallacy that occurs when someone sees contradictory opinions expressed by members of a group and mistakenly believes that those people are being hypocritical, when in reality those contradictory opinions were expressed by separate individuals
Edit: more expo dump


CVE-2016-6210. ask sshd about a user that doesn’t exist and it says no instantly, cause there’s nothing to hash. [The solution is] sshd grabs some other account’s salt and hashes your password anyway
I’m not sure how this is relevant to what caused this bug. Seems to me like a random point that was added by the AI writing this blogpost without human review.


I agree with you. But I disagree on this rule avoiding confusion. I think it does the opposite. I think that’s why most speakers ignore it.


just because a native English speaker ignores a rule in their own language that doesn’t really speak much about the language, it says more about the speaker
It doesn’t. If the speakers of a language ignore a “rule”, that says more about the rule itself. Eventually, a rule like the one we’re discussing will cease to exist since it only complicates communication, as has happened to past rules and words.
I also have an issue with calling it “standard”. “Standard” is whatever everyone uses. Following rules that no one else does makes you sound robotic. It’s why so many guides on pronounciation in English fail. They go off of how the word is spelt and ignore how people actually say it.


The unassuming Czech engineer Ondrej Surý […]
God, such an insult


This guy’s being pedantic. I say “a software” all the time.
It’s important to understand how a language works, but don’t let grammar Nazis trick you into caring about minor rules even English speakers ignore.


each of the profiles would be their own instance
So each author would need to host their own infrastructure? I’m not sure I follow


The real question is who’s willing to help develop this software if someone were to start work on it


I disable IPv6 to reduce the vector
Being lied to


Might be your fault, might not be. There’s a lot of apps that don’t play well with the minimalism from Sway and need workarounds.
It’s always a journey to learn what does and doesn’t work out of box whenever you install minimal software


And there is a last reason, which is less rigorous but matters to us just as much. We write software because we enjoy writing software […] We are not interested in optimizing away the reason we do this.


Man, that’s a shame
It’s one thing to think AI is good. It’s another to call others stupid for rejecting it


Is this a new activity to you? You will get used to it
Why are there poo particles in all the green panels?
“will”, not “should”
I’m not arguing that this is a good thing