Nate Silver’s polling tracker now has Trump slightly favored to win (50.2%) the election. While this shift appears small, it has drawn attention because it pushes Trump just past the halfway mark in forecasts for winning the Electoral College.

Silver explains that while Trump’s rise over recent weeks is significant, and his polling model, is designed to minimize overreactions to new data to provide more accurate long-term predictions (i.e., it’s likely a “real” effect), this doesn’t in any way mean Trump “will” win, and the race remains highly competitive, especially in key states like Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, which are critical to determining the outcome.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    55·
    2 months ago

    a few things.

    Nate Silver is not fivethiryeight. Silver Bullets is a totally different thing. Nate departed fivethiryeight over contract issues years ago. Since then their models have gone off the rails.

    Second, you are fooling yourself if you ignore the reality that Harris has lost all momentum and is backsliding. It’s in all the polling data, and when Nate references high quality polls, none of them vary significantly from the aggregate. Even Quinipiac shows her on her heals.

    Third, almost none of those polls (that you mentioned) are used in Nates analysis. I think Fox and Trafalgar and TIPP, but that’s it.

    So like, conflating 538 with Nate Silver is an issue. I mean 538 had Biden at 60% to win when he was polling at 38%. Don’t get rely on 538 for anything. Also, there is no significant differences between the so called RW pollsters and everyone else among high quality polls. I can drop that analysis for for you.

    Reality is that Harris bungled the campaign thinking she could claim the center and this would motivate voters. America is divided as ever and no one is changing sides. Harris isn’t in a race against Trump and she never has been. She’s always been racing against apathy and the couch, and her rightward shift during and after the convention are what people will see in hindsight as obvious mistakes.

    There are still two weeks left. But she blew off Muslim and ME voters early on. And now she’s struggling with black and brown voters who are the apartheid that Palestinians live under as commiserate with their lives experience. I just don’t see how she wins with effectively a prozionist foreign policy in today’s political atmosphere. And it may only be 3-5% of typically democratic voters who are moved in that issue, but that’s more than enough to lose this election, and it’s been a clear signal in the data since the first or second week of September.

    If Harris doesn’t distance her self from the foreign policy disaster which has been the administrations support for Israel, I don’t see her pulling this one out.

    • Thehalfjew@lemmy.world
      2·
      2 months ago

      I don’t see disagree about what you said regarding the polls, but by that same token, the fact that they are in a virtual tie should read to you she has a way to win just as she is.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        33·
        2 months ago

        Harris needs to be +5 in the aggregate of national polling to be tied. Her being in a virtual tie, is her losing badly. This is just established fact as a function of the American electoral system.