Obvious as it may sound, people with authoritarian beliefs hiding behind free speech actually consider it as a weakness akin empathy. It allows losers like them to amplify their reach despite not being in power. They abandon their “free speech absolutist” postures the moment they think they are in power.

  • piecat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Counterpoint:

    You can say anything in an authoritarian state, the consequences are that you’ll get disappeared in the night.

    • tenton01@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Your argument is… valid. Everyone, we’ve just established worldwide freedom of speech! Put this in the history books!

      • angrystego@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The argument means that if there are severe systematic consequences to some things you say, then it cannot be considered free speech.

            • tenton01@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I’m right there with you, friend. Scary times we’re living in, I wish there weren’t so many events taking place that’ll be in future history books.