Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoAre you threatening me?slrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down126
arrow-up11.38Karrow-down1external-linkAre you threatening me?slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square145fedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 days ago his debate skills are <6th grader, so he literally is Now that’s a logical fallacy.
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 days agoLiterally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 days agoHe literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoWhat i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 days agoI think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?
Now that’s a logical fallacy.
Literally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
He literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
What i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
I think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?