• Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    counter counter point, no one dares wipe off North Korea,

    because US wiping north Korea means the end of LA.

    are you aware of MAD?

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Does it sound like a manchild like Trump cares about MAD? We’re on the precipice of a forever war, world war 3, or possibly even total annihilation of life on earth and you’re sitting there saying everything is great because hyper aggressive nations have nukes.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          So then you agree with me that we, every nation on earth, should be de-escelating and disarming?

          • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            ideally yes,

            but given US leading escalations and ignoring its promises it is stupid for any nation to do so.

            • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              It absolutely is not stupid to do so because the nukes are providing no value and instead dragging them into conflicts.

              • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                look at Ukraine, they had nukes, US promised to protect them if they get rid of them.

                trump is too busy sucking Putin’s boot.

                why aren’t you asking yhe US to eliminate its nukes? UK? Israel? South Africa?

                • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  9 hours ago
                  1. What would have protected Ukraine better than Nukes is NATO membership.

                  2. yes

                  3. https://lemmy.world/post/31766956/17820194

                  I find myself in a lot of these discussions on Lemmy where the other person cannot tell who said what previously and it makes me think it’s all just a bunch of bots here to suck dictator cocks.

                  • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    they didn’t need NATO, they needed US to comply with is treaties, in hindsight trusting the US was a mistake.