• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago
    1. What would have protected Ukraine better than Nukes is NATO membership.

    2. yes

    3. https://lemmy.world/post/31766956/17820194

    I find myself in a lot of these discussions on Lemmy where the other person cannot tell who said what previously and it makes me think it’s all just a bunch of bots here to suck dictator cocks.

    • Anomalocaris@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      they didn’t need NATO, they needed US to comply with is treaties, in hindsight trusting the US was a mistake.

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          They were invaded by 1 of the 2 nations that agreed to protect them if they disarmed. The US did not uphold its obligations 3 times in a row through multiple administration’s. The latest conflict in Ukraine is a result of actions taken by the USA, followed by inaction on our part.

          If we didn’t request their disarmament, lie about protecting them, it would be a very different landscape there right now.

          It isn’t solely the fault of the US, but we are major contributors.