Young voters overwhelmingly say they would support President Biden over former President Trump in a hypothetical head-to-head match-up if the 2024 presidential election were held today, according to a poll released Wednesday.

In the Economist/YouGov poll — conducted via web-based interviews Dec. 16-18 — more than half (53 percent) of registered voters under 30 said they would support Biden, and less than a quarter (24 percent) said they would support Trump.

Another 10 percent said they would support another candidate, 4 percent said they were not sure, and 9 percent said they wouldn’t vote.

    • derphurr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Doesn’t matter, over half won’t be voting. Even less than normal if GOP state legislatures do away with mail in ballots or automatic mailed request forms from COVID times.

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The less people who vote the more elections Republicans win.

        Make sure your friends go vote (unless they’re trumpeter assholes maybe, then don’t talk about it).

        • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Less young people voting is a direct result of the national DNC’s deeply infuriating tactic of promising a fuckton of stuff and then just abandoning those goals and… “compromising” with the GOP every single fucking time the chips are down. And here, “compromise” is pronounced “submit to”, because most Democrats have the neurological inability to understand that these days the GOP will betray them simply on principle, or because one GOP rep wants to tweet something so they can “troll the libs”. And then we all suffer for it.

          We all fucking understand the stakes here. The DNC is actively pushing young voters away by using such a deeply cynical strategy and then thinking we’ll forget all about that stupidity the next time an election comes around. From where a lot of young people are standing, it looks a lot like a choice between “actively bad” and “passively bad”, and it’s hard to give a fuck about that, especially if you’re already struggling with other shit in your life, like most of our generation is to one degree or another.

          Don’t get me wrong - I vote in every single election I can. But the amount of deeply, fundamentally uninspiring or even actively bad candidates I feel I’m forced to vote for, simply because they’re not a neo-Nazi or a member of the GOP is not small. And to all you vOTe fOr a ThiRD pArTY types out there: you and I both know that’s a great way to hand elections to the GOP, given how our shitty electoral system works.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The party is absolutely taking advantage of how bad their opponents have become. Democratic party leadership has regarded the left of the party with such withering contempt for so long, and then they wonder why the left resents them.

            • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s super frustrating, because while I still think it’s possible to move the DNC in a more reliably progressive direction, it’s abundantly clear all the fossils in charge of the party have no intention whatsoever of going in that direction, so we either need to force them out or wait for them to die.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                And in the meantime, the planet is warming and the fascists they keep “compromising” with only need to win once.

      • variaatio@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah these polls always being in terms like “registered voters” or “likely voters”. Where as they really should poll “eligible to vote” instead to get full picture of the societal political mood situation.

    • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder when this magical time was where voting for the president had great choices. What many young voters fail to understand is that it’s not all about the president. Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation, and if you send that to your far-from-ideal president’s desk, they’ll sign it.

      It’s certainly a much easier task than having an awesome progressive president who begs a near 50-50 Congress to pass good bills, and it just doesn’t happen.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Get enough Democrats into Congress, and they will be able to vote for progressive legislation,

        We had 60 and they killed the public option. How many do we need?

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

        The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

      • hglman@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, so we need to force the system to change outside of its normal paths of power to have choices. No one thinks this time existed, everyone understands the current situation is bad.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People need to study how the Moral Majority took control of the GOP. Nixon was a dead duck after he lost his California Senate race, but he knew that an ex-Vice President was a big deal in small places. He campaigned tirelessly for years, getting lots of Reps, Governors, and Mayors elected. In 1968 he breezed in because he had the Party base on his side.

          The MMs did the same. They would show up at every local GOP meeting with enoughvotes to get their agenda enacted. One day the Party big shots looked around and realized that all the dog catchers, county clerks, and sheriffs in their state were MMs.

          repeated comment

            • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Please tell me you’re not talking about the two month window in 2010 where they had a filibuster-proof majority, and passed a major healthcare reform bill, but it was kneecapped because it relied on Joe Lieberman to pass. Because that’s a case where a couple more Democrats would have made a huge difference in what we would have gotten, and also turned 2 months and some change into two years. That’s my point that there’s no exact number.

                • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Having enough is a spectrum: the more there are, the bolder the legislation and the more likely it is to pass. So however many you get, you always fall short of doing even better with more.

                  Single payer healthcare had been discussed in the early stages — and it was clear they wouldn’t have 60 votes for it, so it was a non-starter. Because there were exactly 60 D/Is, there was no wiggle room. And the GOP held up the 60th Senator in the courts as long as they could because they had no wiggle room. And then Ted Kennedy had to vote for the ACA on his virtual deathbed, and after that their 60 votes were gone, so they couldn’t spend more time on healthcare or move on to other tough issues. Lieberman forced them to remove the public option from the bill.

                  But you are just overlooking that they did pass a major, consequential healthcare reform bill that solved some very important problems, which couldn’t be accomplished for decades before then, even though people tried.

                  And this all touches on my original point: a couple more Senators would have changed things significantly at that time, but a more progressive president would not have.

    • Guy Dudeman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      48
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? This poll is literally the same as asking young voters if they would rather have their entire heads cut off or just their eyes and ears gouged out.

      • Xhieron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What on earth are you talking about? Joe Biden tried to give 20k to each of them who went to college. And he would have if the–let me check my notes here: oh, right–Nazis in the other party hadn’t sued to prevent him from giving away money.

        I appreciate that Biden might not be some folks’ first choice, but if you think young people believe another four years of Grampa Joe is just barely more tolerable than the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist traitors, you might need to meet one.

        • Nudding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          It doesn’t really matter in the long run, America is run by oil companies, not the people. Joe signed off on more land for drilling than trump did.

          • SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I believe those were agreements signed by Trump that Biden had to follow through on, no?

            But let’s also be clear, Biden appointed the first Native Secretary of the Interior and signed the Inflation Reduction Act (the most significant climate legislation the US has ever had). Trump appointed Scott Pruitt to lead the EPA.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          27
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brother he’s basically a war criminal the deliberate annihilation of the Republic by fascist dictators is already happening

                • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Also I came back to say this. How do you not see Biden and Trump being our only feasible options as inherently undemocratic? People only like them in comparison to the other. We should not be forced to choose between two objective evils. Are you so resigned to stagnation that you think continuing to enforce a system that exploits is the best option?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Centrists falsely interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump. It’s dishonest.

              • samus12345@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                And realists know that bashing Biden with no nuance, as these comments are doing, does nothing but benefit Republicans.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Then what you’re telling us is there is no opportunity for improvement… Clinton was 30 years ago and Biden is to the right of Clinton. Three decades of “incremental progress” has gotten us nowhere.

              • ZzyzxRoad@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                interpret all criticism of Biden as support for Trump

                When you don’t vote, therefore allowing Trump to win the election…then yeah.

                Equating the above with “all criticism” is what’s dishonest. Plenty of people criticize Biden who voted for him once, and they are still voting for him again. But you know that. We might not like him but believe it or not, we dislike fascism even more. Crazy, I know.

      • Rolder@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        He seems to be doing a pretty good job given his poor circumstances where the Republican house and supreme court are both totally useless.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wel the first two years we had the fuckheads Sinema and Manchin who are basically republicans at this point

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sinema didn’t kill the minimum wage increase by herself. She was one of 8 democrats to vote against workers.

              Manchin is the perfect centrist Democrat.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe pay attention to what’s actually happening rather than just repeating what other people say about him.

        Biden is continuing to seek (and find) pathways to forgiving student loan debt, despite the Supreme Court ruling against his program. Millions of people have had their loans forgiven since that decision, and it seems more are getting it every day.

        Anyone who thinks he’s senile or incoherent should listen to the interview he did on Conan O’Brien’s podcast that was released the other day. I was surprised that it went so well, and Biden was far more lucid than I’ve ever seen Trump.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think he’s senile, I just think he’s out of touch. It’s hard to be in touch as an 80-some year old man.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        40
        ·
        1 year ago

        This…just absolutely this. I was going to post something along the lines of it being a choice between eating shit or being flayed alive, but this is just better. Kudos.

    • qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been saying this for years. It’s kind of not really a choice, as much as it sucks. Let’s just hope enough people actually turn out to vote

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      The alternative would have been a strong primary challenger, in a just world.

      Im actually quite worried that Trump will be removed from all ballots by the supreme court and Biden will lose to Hailey.

      • joenforcer@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think he will get removed from the ballots, at least not in current state. I feel like the argument is going to be the presumption of innocence until proven guilty; an indictment is unfortunately premature. We need to apply the law equally or we’ll get Republicans finding every way to do the same… albeit with no arguments for it.

        I’d rather have Biden lose to Nikki Haley instead of Trump. Yes, I know she’s a legacy Tea Party candidate, I don’t want her, but at least she isn’t campaigning on ethnic cleansing and actually criticized R bullshit like TC&J.

        • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          She literally wants to wage war with Mexico and abolish the Department of Education, as per the first primary debate. She’s also a dangerous loon.

          Ideally we would have a Democratic candidate that could wipe the floor with both of them regardless of who the GOP nominee is.

    • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      80
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      like biden’s presidency

      him and his vice got in office and immediately went back on campaign promises for cannabis, police reform, women’s rights, voter rights everything went to the shitter just like trump

      now here we are AGAIN

      and people screaming just vote HOW? not everyone has that right thanks to politicians like biden

      https://truthout.org/articles/a-federal-court-will-decide-whether-atlanta-voters-could-have-a-say-on-cop-city/

      cop city is happening under biden’s watch too

      no difference with either demopublican

    • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      72
      ·
      1 year ago

      You guys aren’t going to convince anyone to vote with the lesser of evils spiel. Shit’s gonna get bad and all you had to do was pick a real candidate.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You guys aren’t going to convince anyone to vote with the lesser of evils spiel

        What do you think happened in 2020?

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          47
          ·
          1 year ago

          Biden made a bunch of promises and acted like progressives and leftists actually had a seat at the table. The BBB, student loan, weed legalization, rail strike and gaza genocide have made it clear: We do not.

          We gave him a chance and he gave us the finger.

          • TechyDad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            43
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do realize that Biden can’t just declare things into law, right?

            For the first two years, Biden had a Democratic House that could theoretically pass anything he wanted, but a Senate which was split nearly 50-50. If they didn’t get every vote, they could fail to pass a bill. And this doesn’t even get into the filibuster which would tank bills unless 60 votes were reached or the fact that Manchin and Sinema frequently acted to sink Democratic bills despite technically being Democrats. Biden could put some pressure on them, but his options were limited. It’s not like he could hold a gun to their heads and force them to vote on favor of bills

            Since January, Biden has had a Democratic Senate with a razor thin margin and a Republican House. This threw even more wrenches in the works.

            And then there’s the Supreme Court. Thanks to Mitch McConnell, Trump, and the Republicans, the Supreme Court has a huge conservative majority. So Biden can try to take action for things like forgiving student loans, but then Republicans sue, the case ends up in the Supreme Court and the conservative justices rule that Biden isn’t allowed to do this by law. (He’s managed to find a way to forgive some loans even if it wasn’t as much as he wanted to do.)

            Putting all the blame on Biden and saying “he didn’t fulfill all his promises” is disingenuous. He hasn’t exactly had the Congress and Supreme Court that could support what he wanted to do. Could he have done everything anyway and proclaimed that he makes the laws now? Perhaps, but then he’d be a fascist dictator and not working within our political system - exactly the type of thing that Trump wants to do and is properly criticized for.

            • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              32
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s funny, the student loan thing was literally decided by the supreme Court reiterating that executive branch rulemaking can’t be done capriciously, and people are still pushing this patently false idea that Biden can legalize pot with the stroke of his pen.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              42
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Buddy, you seem to misunderstand something here. I’m not trying to convince you of anything. If you want to believe Biden deserves your vote go nuts. It makes no difference to me.

              But I’m telling you as someone who voted for him in the 2020 general: Fuck Joe Biden. Do whatever you want with that information. But trust no amount of these excuses will change my mind. I was already angry I had to give him a chance in 2020 after people voted for him in the primaries specifically to fuck over progressive and leftist efforts. I held up my end of the bargain. Biden and the people who elected him in the primaries did not.

              Fuck Joe Biden for screwing up the BBB. Fuck Joe Biden for negotiating down from $50k student loan forgiveness. Fuck Joe Biden for waiting until after the midterms to fuck over the rail workers. Fuck Joe Biden for blocking the strike. Fuck Joe Biden for supporting Israel against our wishes.

              For someone who needs the votes of people like me to win the 2024 general election he sure ain’t fucking acting like it. He can go fuck himself along with everyone who voted for him in the primaries.

              • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                32
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok, so I get that you are privileged enough that you can probably ride out Trumpist fascism without much real damage, at least for a while. Just understand that there are many vulnerable people who will be seriously harmed by your decision to do anything besides voting for Biden. This isn’t dooming or trying to scare you into a vote, it’s a simple statement of fact.

                If you are fine with that moral liability, then carry on.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  15
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Funny, that’s precisely how I view the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries. Where’s your ire for them?

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Definitely not trump or Biden. If a decent 3rd party candidate shows I’ll go that route otherwise I’ll just write in.

              • BassTurd@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re angry because you’re ignorant, and because of that, you’re threatening to not vote for the best option in the general election out of spite. Not voting or voting for anyone but Biden is an effective vote for his opponent, which at this time appears to be Trump. So you honestly think that there is anyone else currently running that you think would better represent your interests than the guy that had actually tried to do just that without the needed support?

                You can hate the guy all you want, but check in on the reasons you listed and gain a better understanding of the situation around them so you can see how far off you are.

                How about in just a high level way, explain how someone could have realistically handled those situations in a better way that would have benefits the country better. Student Loans, Rail Strike, and Israel, how would you have pleased everyone?

              • _tezz@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I doubt I’m going to change your mind at all, but I just want to let you know your information about the rail strike is incorrect. Biden did help secure sick pay for those workers, here’s part of the statement from the IBEW:

                “We’re thankful that the Biden administration played the long game on sick days and stuck with us for months after Congress imposed our updated national agreement,” Russo said. “Without making a big show of it, Joe Biden and members of his administration in the Transportation and Labor departments have been working continuously to get guaranteed paid sick days for all railroad workers.”

                https://www.ibew.org/media-center/Articles/23Daily/2306/230620_IBEWandPaid

                The student loan aid was also legally blocked by Congress, and the military budgets were also passed by Congress. There’s no magic wand to a lot of the problems you seem to have with Biden, unfortunately. He isn’t the sole authority in the US govt.

          • set_secret@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well buddy, you’re in a two party system. You going to just give a literial fascist a chance because Biden wasn’t able to wrangle the crazies on the other side to agree all the time?

            that’s cutting of your nose to spite your face in the worst way.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            student loan

            Because all student loans forgiven have been forgiven via executive order, Biden is literally the only person who didn’t give you the finger over it

          • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We gave him a chance and he gave us the finger.

            You really think anyone voting for Biden in 2020 had high hopes he’d be a really progressive candidate? People didn’t want him then and we don’t want him now, but as long as we’re dealing with actual nazis on the other side I don’t see how the choice has fundamentally changed in 4 years.

            • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t think anyone who supported say Bernie or Warren thought that Biden was a progressive. However, there were attempts made by the Biden campaign to appeal to progressives. After Bernie lost, Biden and Bernie staffers actually collaborated to release a joint list of policy proposals. I think that gave a lot of progressives false hopes for what a Biden presidency could be.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              You really think anyone voting for Biden in 2020 had high hopes he’d be a really progressive candidate?

              Not high hopes no. But higher and considering the very thin margin he won by in the 2020 general that’s a pretty important point Biden apologists seem to want to sweep under the rug.

          • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe you don’t understand the stakes. Biden is the lesser of two evils, and no other candidate is anywhere near popular enough to take on Trump. Biden is the only ethical vote.

          • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Elect us and maybe we’ll do something about abortion.

            Democrats are in an abusive relationship - it’s just better than the alternative.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              17
              ·
              1 year ago

              There were plenty of better alternatives in the 2020 primaries than Biden. People voted him specifically to fuck over Progressives and Leftists. They’d rather lose to MAGA than leftists.

              • cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                A lot of people voted for Biden in the primaries because they were being told he had the best chance of beating Trump. Plenty of those people actually favored the policy proposals of other candidates.

                • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This is a messaging problem then. The message that other candidates had a good chance against Trump didn’t resonate as much as the message that Biden had a good chance. We need to figure out why that is if we hope to change that.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A lot of people voted for Biden in the primaries because they were being told he had the best chance of beating Trump.

                  Read into that message a bit more and what you get is: “We voted for Biden in the primaries in order to fuck over progressive and leftists efforts.” Now those same people are expecting our votes in the general? They can get fucked.

      • uberkalden@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it’s not at all the fault of you idiots who don’t understand the realities of a two party system

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      72
      ·
      1 year ago

      Literally support ZioNazis commit Genocide

      The “alternative” is Fascism.

      Biden is a Fascist Nazi already.

  • It's Maddie!@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Young voters overwhelmingly prefer the guy who’s not actively trying to destroy the future, how shocking!

    • EasternLettuce@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden is literally trying to destroy the future. He has personally approved many new fossil fuel extraction sites including a pipeline that climate scientists have dubbed a climate time bomb

      • Lasherz12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trumps stated first step is to “drill drill drill” so please explain why this isn’t an effort to dissuade from the better option?

        • EasternLettuce@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I mention trump anywhere in my comment? Your argument is a straw man. The OP said that Biden was not trying to destroy the world. I informed him that Biden is trying to destroy the world, simple as that.

          • joenforcer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Biden isn’t trying to destroy the world. Everything isn’t black and white no matter how much you want it to be. We’re back in the Paris Climate Accords despite how the man-baby in the previous administration pulled out because Obama.

            I mean, if you want to argue that we are going to destroy the world no matter what, we could speedrun it by electing the fascist who wants to destabilize the entire world by pulling out of NATO. I however would prefer to live out the remainder of my natural life instead of nuclear Armageddon deciding for me.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Which is why republicans are trying so hard to push the idea of not being able to vote until you’re much older.

    cause they want to cut off the youth vote, because they’d rather disenfranchise tens of millions and get rid of democracy than risk having to change their positions.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well it’s hardly surprising.

    It’s like preferring a slice of unbuttered slightly stale bread, to a literal dogshit on a stick, being waved around by others with shit all over their faces, knowing that if they eat enough, you’ll have to eat double.

  • rockettaco37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t particularly prefer Biden, but he’s much more preferable than these crazy nazi Republicans running against him

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every week it’s a different poll with a different result and a different headline. All I’m learning is that these polls are meaningless.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not all polls are meaningless. But there are a ton of meaningless polls that get an inordinate amount of attention. And I believe the overall goal of that is to make people think they’re all meaningless.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man, the level of statistics illiteracy here is out of control. I hope y’all are just literal children that are still in pre-algebra or something.

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, just yesterday young voters didn’t like Biden? I’m beginning to think that maybe the news is all made up 🤪

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think that is true. It’s like saying you don’t like a Honda Accord because Ferraris exist. Sure you want everything, but you’ll still appreciate the Accord over the Nike Express.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a fallacy of polling. They only had two choices here. The correct interpretation is they prefer him over Trump, but do not like him.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t like Biden much either, but a tree stump is just unkind. We needed Bernie Sanders, not another TV celebrity. (I do love me some John though)

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Love John, but he won’t do it. He’s said in multiple interviews that his place is outside the establishment generating the public will to act, which he couldn’t do as a politician. I don’t blame him. He seems to be more effective at getting change done than most senators or even presidents.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stephen Colbert might be on that list too. And honestly, Harris would probably work for the same reasons as Biden.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read an article earlier this week that actually explains this. They had a result that young people preferred Trump to Biden – but when they narrowed in on likely voters, it flipped to Biden. They noted that the individuals who preferred Trump tended to not vote in 2020.

      Make of this what you will. I’m not entirely sure myself how to interpret this.

      • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is funny, because I read almost the opposite. These people are just making everything up.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pft of course haha

          Polling companies need to figure out a new strategy. Their current methodology isn’t working. For a poll to be accurate it needs to be a simple random sample. It’s tricky to do, but clearly what we have now is insufficient.

    • dtrain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not made up. Just a large population.

      I could write an article about how Biden is really a cat and find people on the street to provide quotes for it.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a difference between voting for him and liking him. He’s an awful person but the alternative is Trump, so there’s not even as choice there

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Biden is not an awful person. He is a person who has spent a lifetime in politics and high office and has a long record to pick away at. People tend to forget that politics is the art of the possible. People who never compromise are radicals, like the Tea Party people, for example. It makes no sense to bitch about the radicals on the right and then denigrate the centrist. If you have specific criticisms, fine that’s fair, but just summing Biden up as “an awful person” is both unwarranted and naive about the nature of politics.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          You say that like he isn’t using Trump era restrictions on Asylum still and about to restrict the acceptable basis of “reasonable fear” to send more people back to countries where their lives are in danger.

          Or supporting the genocide in Gaza.

          Or getting rail workers killed because he short circuited their strike to save Christmas.

          Or is blaming the current economic crisis on everything but monopolistic/cartel pricing models in necessities like housing and food. While claiming the economy is stronger than ever.

          I could go on. This is all stuff from his presidency. He is an awful person.

          • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            People who don’t understand politics: I want my leader to always act uncompromisingly to solve all of the injustices I see.

            The Tea Party and the Freedumb Caucus: Hold my beer…

            People who don’t understand politics: NoT LiKe Thaaaat!

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I didn’t say he was the worst choice. Just that he is objectively an awful person. He is willing to trade lives of refugees to get more money for Israel who is, right now, conducting summary executions of civilians.

              This doesn’t stop if we don’t acknowledge the problems and pressure him.

              Also, just for fun, I did choose things which he has the authority to unilaterally act on. He can initiate DOJ investigations into price collusion. He can tell Israel to pound sand. He can go back to Obama era Asylum policies. He could have told the rail companies he was willing to stand with the strikers until their very reasonable demands were met.

              • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                You don’t get it.

                Biden is not a king, he is a politician in a deeply divided democratic country. You don’t agree with the current direction of certain parts of US government policy, which is determined by a huge breadth of considerations. That doesn’t make Biden an “objectively awful person”.

                For comparison, Trump really is an awful person. Even most of his supporters don’t think he is a “good person”, they just don’t care about his antics because he appeals to their fears and baser instincts.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  In many ways the American president is very much a king. If you want to argue that he didn’t have the political capital to do so then sure. But as I said above, these are all things within his power, he doesn’t need Congress for any of them. And what he’s doing with that power is morally repugnant. I would argue he’s losing political capital by the truckload every time we get a new report on Israel’s war crimes.

                  And while he can’t buy weapons for Ukraine without Congress (the goal the GOP is holding hostage to kill more Asylees and Gazans) he can authorize Ukraine as a buyer in their own right and get a deal with Ukraine to pay for the weapons later. (This was done in both world wars)

                  He’s pretending he’s stuck where he can’t do anything because people don’t understand the powers of the executive and it’s convenient for him.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Accuses people of not understanding politics

              Gets mad when people won’t vote for someone they hate.

              • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wait, you actually hate Biden? That even worse than “objectively awful person”. Such strong language, especially considering who the alternative is.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is very little I enjoy as much as the moment when someone like you realizes their ideas make them an unpopular minority.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Oh no, negative 2?!? Whatever will I do with my life!

              Oh wait, I need to go make another post about how the entire 2A debate is being held in bad faith so both sides can profit off of dead children. That will pump those numbers. (You think this is a joke but it’s not. The Brady Campaign’s AWB doesn’t address gun violence, just gun LARPing)

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I prefer getting a finger cut off, as opposed to an arm.

    Doesn’t mean I want to lose my finger.

    • cerothem@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Regardless of how you feel about the candidates the important thing is to actually vote. Going around and saying “well they both suck” doesn’t help anyone.

      Not voting then getting the greater of two evils from your perspective is your own fault.

      Always vote, even if the news or anyone else tells you the candidate you want is a sure thing, vote even if the candidate you don’t want seems like a shoe-in.

      • GONADS125@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hillary vs trump was the first election in which I could vote, but I refrained on account of not wanting to vote for a giant douche or a shit sandwich. I will never make that mistake again…

        I’m not a Biden fan, but I voted for him last election and will eagerly do so again this next cycle.

        I also want to point out that the gap between the “lesser of two evils” has turned into the Grand fucking Canyon following trump’s attempts to overthrow our government to remain in power, and platforming on literal fascism…

        It’s a vote for democracy or neonazi fascism. Period.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know why the Onus is literally never on our politicians to do better. We always have the threat of some worse force to keep us in line.

        • cerothem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The public selects the representation every few years, the public votes them out that’s a form of being held accountable. If people ignore their right to vote then that can let people abuse their positions or cause people to pander only to people who actually vote since those are the people keeping them in. D

      • n3m37h@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just like Calarado had done there should be a “none of the above” option.

      • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not voting then getting the greater of two evils from your perspective is your own fault.

        I’m no longer entertaining this perspective since people like you never have anything bad to say about people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries. A vote for Biden in the primaries was a vote specifically made to fuck over progressive and leftist efforts. You’ve got endless energy available to lecture us but none for the people who fucked us over? Pound sand.

        • cerothem@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Respectfully, I think you’re misunderstanding my comments. It’s anyone’s right to hate how or who anyone else voted for. But not voting at all and getting upset with the outcome is your own fault.

          Any person should be encouraging every other person that they know to exercise their right to select an official. Ignoring that right because you feel it’s futile or because your super sure what you want will happen is a breakdown in democracy.

          I don’t really care who or how anyone votes but they all should be doing it.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            But not voting at all and getting upset with the outcome is your own fault.

            I voted for Biden in the 2020 general election and I’m upset with the outcome. So in 2024 I won’t be voting for Biden and I won’t be upset with the outcome.

            • cerothem@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So it doesn’t affect me at all but may I ask why you wouldn’t decide to vote for an independent, or the republican party.

              Really you should vote for whomever most closely aligns with your governing preferences. Ultimately if you dislike the platform of every party, then it should be a decision about which most closely aligns with what you’re looking for.

              If you were deciding what to eat it doesn’t really matter if you don’t like the options, eventually you have to choose something or someone else will choose for you.

              Again I’m not endorsing any party or platform, I don’t care about how you choose to cast your vote. I just think that everyone should vote, even if it doesn’t align with my preferences or voting choices, which again I’m not saying I endorse any party specifically.

              • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Oh. Perhaps I’ve misunderstood you as you tried to explain to me earlier. I’ll be voting third party so if that’s all you were encouraging me to do I apologize for misunderstanding you.

        • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m no longer entertaining this perspective since people like you never have anything bad to say about people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries.

          How exactly do you intend to win future primaries and elections without any of these voters? You have endless energy to criticize moderates about how they need to earn your vote and be higher quality candidates and represent you – what about leftist candidates?

          As long as you hold this double standard, you’re not going to go anywhere. Moderate voters are not obedient little sheep, and progressive candidates are not entitled to moderate votes. If it isn’t progressives’ fault when moderates lose, then it isn’t moderates’ fault when progressives lose.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            How exactly do you intend to win future primaries and elections without any of these voters?

            The same way they intended to win 2024 while fucking us over.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You aren’t losing a finger, you’re being forced to accept that your politics don’t align with most of your fellow citizens.

      Frederick Douglas couldn’t even vote, but he worked for politicians who couldn’t promise to end slavery.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t align with most of your fellow citizens that vote, specifically. And they’re the only ones that count in this case.

          • samus12345@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you’re petty enough to roll over and let fascism win, you were never someone who could be relied on anyway.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              And yet, apparently the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries are relying on our votes because he wouldn’t have won the general without us.

              • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Based on what you know about the GOP, what makes you think that there will even be an election in 2028 it they gain power in 2024?

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t. Question is, why did the people who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries think they could fuck us over and then turn around and expect our votes?

      • LilB0kChoy@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you’re being forced to accept that your politics don’t align with most of your fellow citizens.

        I think younger people are being forced to accept their politics don’t align with most of their fellow citizens who vote and have money. Statistically this means older citizens.

        If there’s anything good coming out of the last two presidential elections I think it’s that younger citizens are becoming more active and galvanizing them to vote and be heard.

  • dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    In an ideal world, maybe the votes would be weighed by the expected remaining life span of the voter.