Unfortunately I cannot parse what you’re trying to say here at all. Maybe rewrite your original point and post it the way you’re intending to. It’s only a sentence or two. I can’t imagine any interpretation of your correction that would make your original point, “the lack of dedicated/assigned/permitted parking is not restricted to apartments alone” true in anything other than a trivial sense. (Obviously you could find some rare houses built without parking, but they’re the exception that proves the rule.)
The point still stands. 95%+ percent of new houses have off street parking. The lack of parking is almost almost exclusively an issue of apartments. It’s not a problem for houses. It is almost exclusively a problem for apartments alone. There’s no part off your comment that could be flipped around or read the other way that would make your original point true.
So no friend, the point certainly does not stand. It’s fallen down dead.
The actual point was that a barely non-zero number of people these days can afford to buy and therefore the vast majority rent. Ergo, charging a vehicle is challenging best, and that’s assuming one has either a dedicated parking spot at said rental or, even rarer, that the rental offers charging stations.
The point is very much stood up and unfazed by the windy expression of your momentary confusion, friend.
Why are you muddying the waters by talking about renting? Plenty of people rent houses, but you’re trying to inflate the size of the charging problem by lumping all renters together. Even then, a simple search will show only 30% of the US population lives in rental housing. And only about 10% live in apartments. Your gut feelings on this are just wrong. You’re not only incorrect, but confidently incorrect.
Unfortunately I cannot parse what you’re trying to say here at all. Maybe rewrite your original point and post it the way you’re intending to. It’s only a sentence or two. I can’t imagine any interpretation of your correction that would make your original point, “the lack of dedicated/assigned/permitted parking is not restricted to apartments alone” true in anything other than a trivial sense. (Obviously you could find some rare houses built without parking, but they’re the exception that proves the rule.)
The point still stands. 95%+ percent of new houses have off street parking. The lack of parking is almost almost exclusively an issue of apartments. It’s not a problem for houses. It is almost exclusively a problem for apartments alone. There’s no part off your comment that could be flipped around or read the other way that would make your original point true.
So no friend, the point certainly does not stand. It’s fallen down dead.
The actual point was that a barely non-zero number of people these days can afford to buy and therefore the vast majority rent. Ergo, charging a vehicle is challenging best, and that’s assuming one has either a dedicated parking spot at said rental or, even rarer, that the rental offers charging stations.
The point is very much stood up and unfazed by the windy expression of your momentary confusion, friend.
Don’t forget to breathe, please.
Why are you muddying the waters by talking about renting? Plenty of people rent houses, but you’re trying to inflate the size of the charging problem by lumping all renters together. Even then, a simple search will show only 30% of the US population lives in rental housing. And only about 10% live in apartments. Your gut feelings on this are just wrong. You’re not only incorrect, but confidently incorrect.
You’re full of shit.