

Claudio Nastruzzi of The Reg chimes in on the inherent shittiness of AI writing, coining the term “semantic ablation” to describe its capacity to destroy whatever unique voice a text has.
he/they


Claudio Nastruzzi of The Reg chimes in on the inherent shittiness of AI writing, coining the term “semantic ablation” to describe its capacity to destroy whatever unique voice a text has.


Look at the fresh garbage LinkedIn served to me today: https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/managing-ai-is-the-next-gen-skill-7655601/
(Why am I still on that godforsaken hellsite)


I wish we could finally agree that tech bros (and MBAs!) are greedy, full of shit and ruining the planet. And then remove both groups from any place of influence.
Prohibiting the teaching of MBAs and/or massively funding the humanities would be a good start. Hell, you could fund the humanities with the cash that currently goes toward MBAs and kill two birds with one stone.


New post from Iris Meredith (titled “Carbon Dysphoria”), comparing the large-scale dysfunction of the tech industry to gender dysphoria - “definitely one of my weirder ones”, by her own admission


Former Reddit CEO
wants humanity to “perish with dignity”
The fuck does a former Reddit CEO know about dignity


Stumbled across a stray blogpost that piqued my interest: A programmer’s loss of identity


Rat-adjacent coder Scott Shambaugh has continued blogging on the PR disaster turned AI-generated pissy blog post.
TL;DR: Ars Technica AI-generated an article with fabricated quotes (which got taken down after backlash), and Scott has reported a quarter of the comments he read taking the clanker’s side in the entire debacle.
Personally, I’m willing to take Scott at his word on that last part - between being a programmer and being a rat/rat-adjacent, chances are his circles are (were?) highly vulnerable to being hit by the LLM rot.


So AI is a parasite that takes from Wikipedia, contributes nothing in return, and in fact actively chokes it out? And you think the solution is for Wikipedia to just surrender and implement AI features?
Given how thoroughly tech bought into the AI hype, that is probably the exact “solution” he’s thinking of.
(Exactly why tech fell for the slop machines so hard, I’ll probably never know.)


some nimrod suggested skilled machinists be outfitted with pressure sensing gloves and cameras and patiently explain eahc machining step so the LLMs could take their jobs
I expected a willingness from HN users to backstab the working class, but I didn’t expect something this blatantly half-baked.
10x developers, 0.1x proletariat.


“As AI enters the operating room, reports arise of botched surgeries and misidentified body parts”
Medical malpractice as a service, coming to a GP near you


The whole thing’s worth reading, but this snippet in particular deserves attention:
Tech companies have done everything they can to maximise the potential harms of generative models because in doing so they think they’re maximising their own personal benefit.


Starting this Stubsack off by linking to Pavel Samsonov’s “You can’t “AI-proof your career” with a project mindset”, a follow-on to Iris Meredith’s “Becoming an AI-proof software engineer” which goes further into how best to safeguard one’s software career from the slop-bots.


The first issue filed is called “Hello world does not compile” so you can tell it’s off to a good start.
The comments are a hoot, at least.


Found a quality sneer aimed at a vibe-coder sysadmin: https://nullrouted.space/2026/02/05/sysadmin-in-the-llm-age/


you completely skipped past one if not the most important theme in the novel which is language and the way people talk and write and the various ways they conduct themselves in different times and places
I don’t think the LWer even realised those themes were there. This whole review screams “failed high school English” to me.


Found another website doing a good job keeping eye on the slop machines and their promoters: The AI Dirty List.
It also lists those who have fought against the bullshit fountains as well.


In other news, Larry Garfield of GarfieldTech has had enough of the bullshit fountains, and put out a fury-filled sneer in response.


New post from Iris Meredith: “Becoming an AI-proof software engineer”
That slopped-out “diagram” plagiarised Vincent Driessen’s “A successful Git branching model”, BTW.