Hi!

Someone asked me to revive their 20 year old laptop as its no longer working on their installation of windows XP.

This baby has around 512MB of Ram, 1.6 GHZ Intel Atom.

This is my first time doing something with hardware older than myself so I’d love some insight from people around.

  • hoppolito@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    28 days ago

    There was recently another user asking the same for a similar machine on the .ml Linux comm.

    As I did there, I can only tell you I successfully ran antix on a similarly old eee-pc from 2007ish, with the same CPU. It did have 1gb of ram though iirc, but the distro ran fairly comfortably (until it came to browsing with many tabs open).

    • airbornestar@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Emphasis mine. Wow, only 2 GiB…

      That’s not as low as you’d think, to be fair. I’ve tried to run Kubuntu on a 10 year old laptop with 2 GiB RAM and it worked, if only a little laggy. That being said, it crashes after half an hour without swap. But with swap, it is legitimately daily drivable (as long as you don’t run heavy apps, of course).

      I’d imagine a distro that’s designed to be even more lightweight would be able to handle that.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      28 days ago

      I’m gonna anti-recommend TinyCore unless you’re an advanced user. The wiki is a trap full of outdated info spread across several different versions of the OS.

  • Akatsuki Levi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    One thing you could try is Alpine Linux It is surprisingly lightweight, and pair it with something like OpenBox or maybe XFCE, and it might be quite good

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    512MB of Ram

    Arch does technically „„run”” on it™

    Otherwise regarding the CPU, I would set up a gentoo with distcc on it, since you dont be daily driving the thing anyways

  • BCsven@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    RAM will be an issue if they want a Desktop Environment. It would be good to find out max RAM that machine supported and purchase a replacement stick.

    If you can get at least 2gig you might have an OK platform.

    If you can’t increase RAM then there is a cool project called HaikuOS that is super lightweight, they have some popular packages for it, butitd is not a Linux distro with tons of availabe apps. Its got a late 90s feel to it.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      This is the answer. Tiny Core is absolute best for old hardware as it gets running upto speed quickly takes very little resources and you can see what kind of resources it consumes and can add things to it to make it useful.

      • BoloMKXXVIII@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        Doesn’t Tiny Core load into RAM? With 512 MB that could be a problem. There are many versions of Puppy Linux. I think they load into RAM also. I would try MX Linux and see if that worked. Expanding the amount of RAM would be helpful, but it is not worth spending money on that machine. I bought a functioning Fujitsu laptop with a 6th gen Core i5 Processor and 8 GB RAM for $80 on Ebay. Computers with a 7th gen Intel Core Processor or older won’t officially run Windows 11 so they are selling for cheap these days, if you shop around.

        • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          29 days ago

          Tiny Core can loadit self into RAM, but it doesn’t have to, you can do a normal install as well. Also even if you want to run it from RAM, it only takes 46MB in RAM not ideal but manageable with 512MB. Also you can even downgrade if you are not UI dependent, you can install the core (non-tiny version) and only needs 26MB RAM.

          • Blaster M@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            28 days ago

            Also consider Windows XP requires 200 MB of RAM to function, before we run any apps at all, so Tiny taking 46 MB to run leaves a huge headroom.

  • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    I wanted to say tiny Core, but someone gave that. So I’ll give another suggestion. Use something XFCE based or LXQt based. Maybe mint in XFCE De is the way to go if you want a feature rich solution that is light on resources.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Maybe mint

      Most ubuntu-based are 1 GiB minimum and dropped support for x86 though.