• Tattorack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s mot that we hate teenage girls (and women) so much. It’s just money. Soulless, apathetic money making.

      A teenager is in a vulnerable state. Some more than others. But self esteem, self worth, and existentialism are things that a teenager as, at the very least, a brush with.

      An emotionally vulnerable person is more open to suggestion. Religion does this a lot. Advertising is no different.

    • Tire@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 hours ago

      We don’t hate them, it’s just that capitalism has found them to be an easy and vulnerable target for manipulation.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        And I genuinely loved all that stuff as a kid, usually liking the ad (e.g., TMNT cartoon) more than the toys (e.g., TMNT action figures).

        As your typical Lemmy user who loves Linux and hates advertisements, I sometimes have to remind myself about that when my son is watching today’s dumb kid shows. Teaching him about the systems in play rather than isolating him from it has been working well IMO.

        The bonus is that he doesn’t watch full-on advertisements and commercial breaks like we were forced to in the 80s when it was live TV or no TV.

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The bonus is that he doesn’t watch full-on advertisements and commercial breaks like we were forced to in the 80s when it was live TV or no TV.

          I think the problem for modern youth is that there’s no way to tell what’s an ad anymore. Scrolling through TikTok or any social media will show you tons of advertisements which are not marked as advertisements.

          The mainstream internet is driven by advertising. At least when I was a kid we could step out during the commercial breaks.

          • Zink@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think the problem for modern youth is that there’s no way to tell what’s an ad anymore.

            Too true. Fortunately my kid is too young for full blown social media, so I have a few more years to keep teaching him.

        • psivchaz@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It’s the state of advertising tbh. If ads were still of the “Look, here’s a cool product” variety, or even the “Look, here’s people happily using a cool product” kind then the world would probably be a better place. Even targeting isn’t so bad, when it’s broad like “We want businesses to know about our B2B product.”

          The evil in modern advertising is the overly specific targeting, the lying, the psychological tricks, and the way they seem to invade every possible space.

        • RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          For anyone that is downvoting this. Go ahead and try to run a business without advertising, let me know how that works out for you.

        • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          This is one of those bizarre Lemmy echo chamber things. I’ve never seen this sentiment that advertising is evil and should be stopped at all costs anywhere else but on Lemmy it’s super common. Idk where it comes from. I get that advertising kind of sucks but it just seems like a weird thing to get so passionate about especially considering how many other things are wrong with the world. Sorry you’re getting downvoted to hell, you’re not crazy, Lemmy is.

          • brot@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            That famous Bansky quote is older than Lemmy and is posted all over the Internet. There are cities around that ban all advertisements. There are movements for a ban on ads in public spaces in many cities all around the world. That really has nothing to do with Lemmy

          • Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            This has been a huge public viewpoint for decades. I think it was Banksy who had the quote about if you force me to view your ad by putting it in a public space then it is mine to do with a I please.

            Businesses have to survive, but advertising is insidious and invasive. Could it be regulated? Sure.

          • mcv@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            I know one example of advertising that I liked: the creators of Penny Arcade had only advertisements for computer games that they liked. And they made those ads in the same art style as their own comic.

            Advertisements are good when they’re an honest endorsement. Any others are inherently deceptive and often invasive.

          • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Some level of advertising is a necessary evil when you’re in a capitalist system because otherwise people have no way to get their products out ti the market. There’s a balance to be struck.

            Hell even in other systems advertising is still important for finding out about cool new things even if money no longer exists

        • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          They can put up signs inside their business windows. That’s plenty. Everything is a blight.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    can’t believe a social network started by incels in college to rate girls sexually would do something like this.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    24 hours ago

    lol, Jesus. It is like what a screen writer would come up with for a movie that contained a terrible company run by terrible people doing stuff so outlandishly terrible everyone watching would think “the absurdity of the terrible is how you know it is made up”.

  • Therobohour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s 0% surprising. FB had always been about making girls feel bad. It’s in its sorce code

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Facebook started as a Hot or Not website. Fucking creepy.

      YouTube also started because the founders wanted to see the Janet Jackson nipple slip. (Which fuck them for that.)

      • Therobohour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Ya FB is,was and will forever be bad for society and woman especially

        I mean,do you really think janet jackson didn’t want people to see?

        • andros_rex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I mean,do you really think janet jackson didn’t want people to see?

          No, I don’t.

          It’s interesting how Justin Timberlake had a career after that incident; when was the last time anyone’s heard from Janet Jackson?

          I don’t see how this is different from revenge porn.

      • Therobohour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Ya FB is,was and will forever be bad for society and woman especially

        I mean,do you really think jackson didn’t want people to see

  • faltryka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    345
    ·
    2 days ago

    At some point we need to start criminalizing shit like this and actually holding people accountable.

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        140
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thus far, they’d basically be right. Any fines are simply chocked up to “cost of doing business” expenses and since no one wants to either make solid laws against this stuff OR hold them accountable for current ones, they’ll just keep at it.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            That depends on if it is a dayfine or not.

            A fine of €500 for speeding will only really affect poor people, 30 dayfines which value is dictated by the wealth of the individual is a better system.

            • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              This can be hard to implement and avoidable through “creative accounting” (e.g. living off daddy money with no declared income) so as a hybrid/additional solution fines should turn into penalties over repeat offences.

              Some countries use points licensing where your driver’s license will simply be taken away if you have too many recent infractions on record.

              Companies should also be prevented from doing certain kinds of business if they repeatedly break the law. We have legal frameworks for this, we are just refusing to apply them due to politics and corruption.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s so much bigger than this. It starts young. iPad kids. Strict gender roles. Sexualization of children. Learning from parents who have been conditioned by capitalism, sexism and more. We got little girls that want skincare products and teens talking about plastic surgery. It’s bad.

      Agreed though. Punish people for ruining society. I think I read a while ago that France had required social media posts to flag when images have been altered. We need more laws like this too.

      • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        As little kids we got like no genderbased education from our parents. When we moved our grandmother got a lot more control and dumped blue boyish stuff on my brother and forbid the girly things. Has never worn a dress since and now is still not willing to wear one

        (it could be that us older sisters influenced that he wants to wear dresses too)

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Bummer. Happens to almost all men in the US. Maybe less now, but this new red pill generation is wild.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I need context to understand your story. How old was your brother when you moved? How often was he wearing dresses before the move? How quickly did it stop? And how old is he now?

          • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago
            • he was ~4 years old
            • i actually dont know how often, but i would guess as often as we others too. from what i understood he actually liked it so often enough
            • a few weeks or months (was 5 at the time so its mostly something i heard from older siblings & mother)
            • 21 i think
      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And mass sharing of images/videos which has made it so much easier to connect people, specifically in one case I saw today of someone on Telegram sharing child porn. How do you even put the cat back in the box?

          • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Unfortunately, the “used intelligently and responsibly” part is why people dislike AI - they don’t trust companies or people to use it that way (and for good reason based on the results so far).

            Plus, it’s not gonna put everything back into Pandora’s Box. What we’re in is a societal and cultural arms race where AI is just another escalation that’s being used by both sides.

            • venusaur@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              It’s funny you reference Pandora’s Box. I often use it to refer to the growth of AI and people’s resistance towards it. It’s not going anywhere. It’s not slowing down. We gotta make it work for us.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That does make sense, although I’m not sure we can trust it to work like that.

        • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          It has always been this way. When you get old, 15 year olds and 19 year olds start to all look the same.

          Similarly, to teenagers a 40 year old and a 60 year old look the same. Old.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s hard to say if it’s one of those things that older gens say is different with newer gens even though it the same. I will say though, the convergence of sexualization of children and infantilization of adults have been narrowing the gap and maybe one is winning over the other.

    • Landless2029@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Oh you mean fines? Sure here’s some money $$.
      Meanwhile AD rev is $$$$$. Just the cost of doing business!
      Hahahaa

  • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Centralized social media is an advertisement platform that targets advertisements according to information & conduct users feed the platform, and some of those users are teenagers?

    They’re advertising cosmetics to teenagers unlike ever before in the history of teen-centric media?

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    The book is very good. Reading it now. The writer starts off with a great story about a shark attack.