That’s French toast erasure.

If that happens and the factory layoffs come, those nets are gonna be full

Set it on “waterproofs” for some Urotsukidōji: Legend of the Overfiend level nasty

“Project Warp Speed” really gets talked up these days.

It’s the aliens from Mexico! No, wait, Canada! No, wait, the drones in New Jersey! No, wait…

The double-supreme court is a Taco Bell menu item.

“Mom, I’m getting fed up with this orgasm!”

Same as that asshat in NC. May they eat every tortilla chip vertically.

The Victorian era had a whole coded obituary system for this kind of thing, e.g. “he was generous with his affections and had a convivial spirit” aka a drunk who cheated on his wife constantly.

Gotcha, thanks for the info!

From AP News:

In a news release, police say officers made contact with the man who was then arrested on unrelated charges

Same old shit, just come up with something like “he took 31 minutes in the dining area so we got out the batons”

I think there might be a caveat here: when doing peer-to-peer, the insurance side often doesn’t give their names. This was a tactic used when I worked the phones at a company that would occasionally get subpoenaed— never give our name, document what was said, then hand it off to our supervisors who would go in our place as “operator 17” and read off our notes as the totality of the statement. I have zero faith in the insurance companies to have any sort of integrity here, and suspect they’d use a similar tactic to justify any decision making.

Greenville, NC in a Walgreens, around 2013. A man who looked like, or could well have been Gary Busey, in a leather jacket, in a pile of talcum powder on the floor, was picking up handfuls of powder and snorting them.

Thoughts and prayers are considered “out of network” on this one my dude

It’s like Ben Dreyfuss minus the ambien in there.

It’s not so much that they don’t give a damn, but that they can’t tell. I taught some basic English courses with a research component (most students in their first college semester), and I’d drag them to the library each semester for a boring day on how to generate topics, how to discern scholarly sources, then use databases like EBSCO or JSTOR to find articles to support arguments in the essays they’d be writing for the next couple years. Inevitably, I’d get back papers with so-and-so’s blog cited, PraegerU, Wikipedia, or Google’s own search results. Here’s where a lot of the problem lies: discerning sources, and knowing how to use syntax in searches, which is itself becoming irrelevant on Google etc. but NOT academic databases. So why take the time to give the “and” and “or” and “after: 1980” and “type: peer-reviewed” when you can just write a natural-language question into a search engine and get an answer right away that seems legit in the snippet? I’d argue the tech is the problem because it encourages a certain type of inquiry and quick answers that are plausible, but more often than not, lacking in any credibility.

*microplastics

“Hand us your money and us MBAs promise it’ll eventually get somewhere safe” is not reassuring even before the lie.

Streets of Rage theme starts playing