• Cattail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    i figured that some did it when elon banned that account on twitter i never got around to looking for it

  • silasmariner@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only reason I give the slightest slightly green toilet-bowl-staining shit about this is because it upsets him and he deserves to be upset

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah, he just purchased the world’s biggest megaphone from which he could propel his ketamine fuelled opinions into the deep uncaring void of the internet.

      • reksas@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        i wonder what would happen if someone was to point a laser at coincidently same direction as where the plane is

        • Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Fuck all most likely. You’d have to have an extremely steady hand and do it as the plane was landing. But the pupil of a pilots eyeball is an extremely small target.

          • reksas@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Oh, i thought it would do something more. At least I have had an assumption it would mess with some sensor or cause somekind of alarm

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    adding so it’s archived in as many places as possible:

    the reg is N628TS, and you can track it with any ADS-B service

    ADS-B is broadcast from the plane, and able to be picked up by any in-range receiver… services like flight radar 24 aggregate many receivers across the world run by ordinary people

      • jaredt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Tim Cook, Larry Ellison, a plane owned by Google, and a few megachurch guys among others, if I recall correctly

    • PorcupineSlippers@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Air traffic information is already publicly available. The author of the bot simply scrapes data for Elon’s Jet. You can use websites like FlightAware, Flightradar24, and PlaneLogger that provide real-time tracking of flights, including private jets. You can also search for specific aircraft or view flights in a particular area. I remember shortly after Elon bought Twitter he got the account suspended.

      • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Except the commercial aggregators have all started filtering the data of specific planes on request - you won’t find Elon’s or Swift’s ADSB data on popular sites/apps like FlightAware or Flightradar24. (I’m not familiar with PlaneLogger). Open source aggregators like OpenSky or ADSB Exchange will have them though, but the UIs of those sites are far less polished and have fewer features.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        and worth noting that by “publicly available” here, it’s not like it’s published on some FAA API: ADS-B is broadcast from all aircraft, and anyone can receive its data… these services run by networks for regular members of the public contributing the data from their ADS-B receivers

        • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          So you’re telling me it’s only a matter of time before Skum orders his pilots to go dark and cease broadcasting, and then they’re going to hit a jet liner full of families trying to escape his corporate hell.

    • arakhis_@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      like a global map with filters by business sector, flight reason, etc

      man this would be sick hehe

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The FAA is changing the rule which makes this information public. The FAA is fully controlled by the rich.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      ADS-B is public broadcast though… if you’re in range of the plane, you can pick up its air traffic control data (elevation, speed, heading, registration, etc)… services like flight radar 24 don’t work on FAA data: they are a huge network of regular people across the globe with ADS-B receivers contributing everything they see

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      The rules will really change when the first billionaire on a private jet gets taken out by a DIY suicide drone.

    • blazeknave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I thought they just slightly obfuscated it, but bc the importance of tail numbers for safety, they can’t do so completely. I’d love a complete explanation from someone knowledgeable.

      • aramova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just months until they apply the Steve Jobs rule to tail numbers.

        Lease a new private jet every 3 months and you don’t need plates, or tail numbers.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      To be honest I can’t think of non evil people that ride private jets. If somebody wanted to do violence against billionaires they could probably take down any corporate sized jet.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Okay, I’m aware of the irony of what I’m about to say, but please hear me out before getting out the torches and pitchforks. I couldn’t think of an ethical use for private jets, so I asked ChatGPT (Yes, the coal-powered theft engine). It gave the following (unedited):

        That’s a great and nuanced question. While private jets are often criticized — and rightly so — for their environmental impact and association with luxury excess, there are some contexts where their use can be argued to be ethically justifiable, especially when alternatives are limited or time-sensitive. Here are a few examples:

        1. Medical Emergencies & Humanitarian Aid

        • Air ambulances are essentially private jets equipped for rapid medical response. They save lives in time-critical emergencies, transporting organs for transplant or patients who can’t fly commercially.
        • In disaster zones, private aviation can be used to bring in aid, doctors, or evacuate people when commercial options are unavailable or too slow.

        2. Remote Access for Critical Work

        • Some humanitarian workers, scientists, or engineers travel to remote areas with no viable commercial flights. In such cases, private aircraft may be the only way to access those locations efficiently and safely.
        • This applies to environmental researchers, doctors serving indigenous communities, or people inspecting infrastructure in inaccessible regions.

        3. Time-Critical Leadership Roles

        • In rare cases, heads of state, negotiators, or executives overseeing urgent crisis response may use private jets if the time saved could mean large-scale impact (e.g., preventing war escalation, saving a company that employs thousands).

        4. Cargo Over Passenger Transport

        • Private aircraft aren’t always carrying people — they can also be used for urgent supply deliveries, such as vaccines, scientific samples, or critical parts needed to fix failing infrastructure.

        Important Caveat

        Even in these ethically defensible uses, there’s room for scrutiny. The key ethical tension lies in necessity vs. convenience — is the jet being used because there’s truly no better option, or just to avoid discomfort?


        If you’re thinking of a specific situation, I can help analyze whether it might be ethically justifiable too.

        I hate to admit it, but I think it’s correct. The existence of private jets isn’t the problem, they’re just overabundant because they’re not taxed adequately. Having said that, I believe you’re right in that, if a small passenger jet were to crash, it’s more likely to make the world a better place than a worse place.

      • Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, those airports need throngs of people to defend those billionaires before they can slither away to safety. So many protectors.