Well, so much for scientific research in Antarctica…it’s about to be a war zone.

  • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    3 days ago

    Born too late to die in war over oil, born too early to die in war over oil, born just in time to die in war over oil.

  • 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    3 days ago

    Trump’s about to liberate Antarta… Aunt Tart… Antitartica… the place where the polar bears live!

    • MajorasTerribleFate@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Fun fact, though you may have known. Arctic basically means “of the bear” because of the northern position of Ursa Major (bear constellation, also the Big Dipper). Antarctic means “not of the bear”. Because of how words work, it’s also Arctic = “north” and Antarctic = “anti-north”.

      • J92@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also pretty fun coincidence that the northern one is the only one with actual bears.

    • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      We? Bring them behind the shed in my back yard and ‘we’ won’t have this problem.

      I’d happily eat some long pig to reduce the overabundance of whiny bitches with money.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey what is this we? Don’t bring me into this. It’s always the same few assholes at the top doing it all

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is it not incumbent upon the rest of society to stop a maniac when he threatens to burn everything down? Inaction in the face of evil is complicity. We all need to start organizing for the revolution.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The year is 2070. Common daily temps are between 35-45°C. Only 200k humans survive globally, and barely.

    They still use fossil fuels to generate electricity…

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      4 days ago

      A truce has been reached between the forces of AE-X11 Musk and the virtual consciousness of Jeff Bezos as they vow to unite against the tribal council of the former Russian Federation to secure the remaining oil reserves in the desert plains of the Antarctic continent

    • Triumph@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      If there’s only 200K people left, everything is going to be fine … for them.

    • A_A@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Human population now being only 0.00025% of its peak, their greenhouse gas emissions are now insignificant, so, the planet is now finally recovering, fast.

      Edit : obviously I’m not a writer.

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Doesn’t need a lot of oil to upkeep a population of 200k humans though.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe, but look at that territory, it’s perfectly positioned to unlock more agriculutural land northward as the world further south burns. I bet the Russian ruling class is eagerly awaiting this scenario that would put them towards the top of the pile in world powers. They may end up in a position to pick and choose from waves of immigrants.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Problem is that it isn’t that simple. The general fact we do know is that the atmosphere will be more energetic and, on average, the globe will be hotter. The more energetic facet means more weather activity and changes to various currents. So local weather may be more impacted by a change in wind current temperature wise. The change in storm activity may be the bigger concern rather than temperatures. We don’t know how much viable agriculture will be possible or exactly where it will be. Also there’s the question of soil quality. It’s a dangerous gambit to assume a straightforward “Lots of snowy land now means lots of agriculture in a warmed globe”.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      A larger nation with a massive population like India or China will unilaterally employ some kind of geoengineering project long before it gets to that level of lost profits.

      Likely it will be some kind of massively risky atmospheric particle seeding to reflect some percentage of sunlight, which could have unknown consequences down the line.

  • glibg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Solar is moving so fast, no way this will be economically feasible to draw up. Leave it in the ground!!

      • glibg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        If we stop burning it for energy I think there will be plenty left for plastic without needing to dig new wells.

        • Spaz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Cost more to recycle which is the problem. If it was all biodegradable from plants would be best.

  • excral@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The issue with fossile fuels or more generally oil dependency isn’t the limited availability. It’s that they’re massive deposits of stored carbon and if we start burning them they get released to the atmosphere. With the oil deposits already known if we use them all, we’d have killed the planet long before the last drop of oil is used. We don’t need any new deposits.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s almost poetic. The oil got there because there was once vegetation on Antarctica, that decayed over the eons. Now the thirst for oil will lead to heating the planet enough to melt the ice again.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    4 days ago

    For comparison, Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserve at 303 billion barrels.

    Winter is coming.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Venezuela has the world’s largest oil reserve

      Is THAT why we have an aircraft carrier off the coast?

      They’ve got oil and they’re NOT sharing it with rich people?

      • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        I mean to be fair they just don’t have the infrastructure to extract it anymore. Economic sanctions since the Obama years have mean that the equipment to extract crude has become hard to maintain.

        A graph showing the steep decline of venezuelan oil production since the US economic sanctions

          • decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            No. But they aren’t refusing to sell it. They just don’t have it. And are under various sanctions by the US, EU and most south American countries over human rights abuse so they probably couldn’t sell oil anyway.

            Actually it’s kinda ironic that Venezuela is under sanctions for human rights abuse but not the Gulf states.

            Oh and I wasn’t actually trying to go anywhere with my comment but I do realize how it sounds now. But I am not in favor of invading anyone

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I read somewhere that a large amount of the refining capacity in America is geared towards dilbit like the one that used to come from Venezuela and now from Canada. Perhaps Venezuelan fishermen’s oil is still cheaper in the end and therefore more desirable.

        • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 days ago

          Won’t somebody PLEASE think of the cocaine?

          Not that Venezuela has any. But I think we can all agree that legalizing cocaine and doing lots of cocaine is the most important issue of the day.

          COCAINE!!!