US Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (Democrat, New York) isn’t fazed by Congress’ failure to move forward with the impeachment of Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

From her perspective, Democrats have almost too many people to investigate once they gain control of Congress in January.

“There are so many criminals in this administration, it’s hard to figure out who should be, you know, the order of operations,” Ocasio-Cortez said in an interview with CNN’s Manu Raju on Tuesday.

“There are going to be many, many, many investigations,” she added. “I imagine many subpoenas, and we have to follow wherever the evidence takes us.”

  • ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There’s a lot to probe and arrest but make it work. You go after everyone. Have have to do it all while you work on your campaign promises and fix what Trump broke. All of it.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Tier 1:

    • affordability efforts
    • universal healthcare
    • end Iran war
    • end military support for Israel

    Tier 2:

    • abolish ICE
    • prosecute the corrupt
    • codify body autonomy
    • reform the supreme court

    Tier 3:

    • end Cuban blockade
    • end the electoral college

    This is by no means an exhaustive list, but they need to get results on Tier 1 ASAP in order to maintain progressive and MAGA turncoat votes.

    • Malyca@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      People need their food stamps back too, the ones Trump kicked off. Disabled people kicked off other aid too.

    • Yggnar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      … Sorry, off topic, but why is your icon the buc-ees mascot? Those guys chug maga cock like their life depends on it.

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Irony. Think punks and John Lennon rocking Mickey Mouse tees. Buc-ee’s is the height of MAGA brain rot culture. A gas station treated as some sort of cultural identity.

        That said, they are great rest stops…

        • Malyca@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          My husband brought me bucees sweat pants from his business trip to Austin, we both had a laugh. Then we read up on the owners 😳.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You know I hate tankies as much as anyone else, but I’ll honestly say JoMiran is one of the few .ml users who doesn’t seem to be one.

          As in, they’re actually capable of rational thought/discussion and has some decent takes from time to time, which a tankie would be utterly incapable of

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Wait what, when did anyone mention swastikas? I must have missed that part of the conversation. What I saw is that they said punks wore mickey mouse shirts. Which is a completely different thing.

              I’m not here to defend .ml as an instance, I think it’s garbage and most of its users are disingenuous trolls and accelerationist edge lords who would rather see the world burn with no plan to rebuild after rather than contribute in any meaningful or reasonable way to any sort of productive discussion whatsoever.

              That being said, I’ve seen JoMiran around on different threads and they don’t act like the usual .ml user. There’s a couple others too, but they’re very much the exception rather than the rule over there. That’s all I’m saying.

              And I never listened to the sex pistols, but there are plenty of punk bands who hate nazis, and honestly the punk ethos is diametrically opposed to fascism, so that weird subgenre of nazi punk is not only an oxymoron, but they’re also just a bunch of posers appropriating the aesthetic and not really punks. They would get chased out of any regular punk venue. Call it gatekeeping if you want but nazis are not punk, even when they try to call themselves that.

            • teslekova@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Sigh. Anti-NATO and pro-China is not pro-Russia. If anything, we agree with you libs that China and the USA are fighting a proxy war using Russia and Ukraine as condoms.

              The US provoked it, Russia started it, then China stepped in and used the opportunity to make Russia completely economically dependent on them.

              Russia sucks in so many ways. Ukraine sucks way less because they were the ones who got invaded, and I’m far more on their side, but they have problems too. The people of both countries are being used and thrown away by unaccountable foreign bastards (and domestic bastards in Russia’s case).

              It’s just a game to the people at the top. China wants to limit Western advancement on their western flank, and the US/NATO wants to kill Russians and advance their economic influence into countries previously dominated by Russia.

              It’s two capitalist markets trying to gain power over each other. We at ml think the solution to this is to bring down capitalism, and the major other communist faction on Lemmy is to do that but bring down the state as well.

              Now, does any of this sound like we are pro-Russian to you?

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            They’re tankies. So they’re big fans of obvious fascism and authoritarian ideas claiming it’s basically anything else.

            Meanwhile the US is evil incarnatez and absolutely everything they do is bad, without exception. Russia and China do no wrong. Even when they do the exact same things.

            They’re not big fans or critical thinking over there, and aggressively ban anyone not participating in the group think.

            • NoOutlines@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              You just replied to me to explain, in answer to my question “Why does dou9m think that I can expect every ml user to be a fan of a gas station brand?” is that its because they are authoritarians? Like I was making a joke obviously, but your response doesn’t actually make any sense.

              Don’t worry, we all know what tankies are, and we all think they are very silly and unimportant people. It’s hard to spend any time on lemmy without knowing about them. I find the people who follow them around screaming about it to be just as annoying as they are.

              So for future reference: We get it, my dude.

              • dou9m@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Don’t worry, we all know what tankies are, and we all think they are very silly and unimportant people. It’s hard to spend any time on lemmy without knowing about them.

                I guarantee you a gigantic chunk of people on this site, and even more importantly, all of the people who will end up migrating to Lemmy over the following year, are going to have no idea how to even slightly define what a tankie is.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    She really blew it when she decided to announce that she wasn’t going to back anyone else against establishment “leadership.”

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      She’s on a tightrope.

      She has a lot of people whispering in her ear to primary Schumer in 2028, and calling for someone else to be the majority leader would essentially be a declaration of intent when she’s still weighing her options between that, running for President, accepting a VeeP nomination, or maybe joining the cabinet in 2029.

      • krashmo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That’s not a tightrope. Those are just different ways for her to personally respond to the same problem. She could say Chuck and Hakeem suck publicly and all of those options are still on the table.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          If she doesn’t persue Schumer’s seat in 2028, she’d be making a powerful senator from her own state an enemy needlessly. She has no vote in the Senate leadership, and she’s not going to change the mind of anyone who does have a say in it. Her strongest allies in the Senate are already going to vote against him. What good does publicly chastising him do?

          • krashmo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It lets her constituents and supporters know that she understands and shares their position. That’s the whole purpose of having a representative in the first place. They are supposed to say things on your behalf, and not only when it benefits them personally. In fact, I would argue that you can’t be a good representative if you aren’t willing to do that when it doesn’t personally benefit you.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Accepting a pardon is accepting guilt. In doing so they wave their 5th amendment rights and can be compelled to testify. Which they should all be. Everything thurroughly investigated and documented. Hopefully re incriminating them and others with state charges.

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Ya, none of them will actually pay any really consequences. Very good argument for limiting the pardon power of the president.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    NGL kind of wish some of these congresspeople would stfu so the criminals have less time to prepare before January.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Criminals are going to do what criminals do. The election results were a warning, they’ll prepare for things even if everyone was quiet about it. I say keep talking, pump up their anxiety. Get Trump pissed off more, he tends to fire people then.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I remind you that the case against Trump after his first term ended relied heavily upon classified documents secretly stored in Maralago, some of which were flushed down toilets.

        The secret service communication devices and servers all got “accidentally” wiped once congress subpeona’d them.

        If we give crooks time to prepare then they will successfully destroy evidence.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The ones that are smart enough already started preparing as soon as the map started to go blue.

      The others are too incompetent to actually hide their crimes.

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I find it hilarious that you think Republicans do or don’t do things based on how much we talk about them doing it lmao. Very gullible thinking.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Yeah. bullshit.

          Democrats should be looking at making real change:

          1. Reducing Presidential powers substantially. No more pardons and vetos and executive orders.

          2. Sweeping reform with new harsh anti-corruption laws.

          3. Term limits for the house. two terms and done.

          4. Criminalize stock trading among congress.

          Fix the rot going forward…no? then they are just looking for their turn at the trough.

          • dou9m@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Agreed, although I think before angthing they need to prosecute every single person from John Roberts to every single person Trump has pardoned. Put them all in ICE holding cells like the terrorist illegal aliens they are.

            Unfortunately it would take decades of non-uniparty rule to fix this so everyone under 30 can kiss their futures goodbye lol.

    • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Well luckily Hakeem Jeffries who she endorses is going to do nothing about it.

      You’ve twisted her words, and she’s already explained it.

      The Speaker selection takes place in roughly three weeks via a fixed ballot. There are no write-ins. Candidates who want to be considered have to write a letter to the entire Democratic house caucus announcing their intention.

      Right now, today, there is no one other than Jeffries on that ballot.

      So explain to the rest of us how she – or any other House dem – can elect a different candidate for Speaker when there is no other candidate currently running.

  • Endgame@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Sure AOC. I believe you just as much as you said Biden was tirelessly working on getting Israel to agree to a ceasefire.

    How many times have the Democrats obtained power, done nothing, then let it go right back to the Republicans again? They are beyond worthless.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I wish American news would stop reporting on what Democrats MIGHT do … and just report on what they already did.

    They keep pumping this endless hope fountain and its getting tiring … I’d rather hear about what was actually done rather than listening to the possibilities.

    • cruseo@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They don’t even get sworn into office until January 3, and you’re already upset that they haven’t done enough?

      Until then, the present minority has essentially no power.

      So, for now, they’re talking about what they plan to do once they do get the majority in Congress.

    • zoloftt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The news reports on whatever. This happens to be that whatever.

      You can just, not read it?

      Edit: it’s HuffPo, what are you expecting???

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They’re owned by the opposition, of course you’re getting tired of it. That is the whole fucking point lol.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    magas will obstruct and ignore subpoenas and Dems will get blamed for not doing anything, hope I’m wrong and good luck!

    • dou9m@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You’re downvoted for this but you’re right, even though I (and probably most of the people who downvoted) assume you’re a rightwing dork.

      Off the top of my head: Hailey Stevens, Schumer, Fetterman, and Jeffries are all deserving a long and litigious battle at the ICC where they are hopefully sentenced to strict punishments for being directly involved in genocide. I’d go as far to say that both Biden and Trump should be as well, which then sets a precedent for both Bush and Obama to be indicted by them as well.

      And yes I’m aware about how the US feels towards the ICC, that should absolutely change too.

      • NoOutlines@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It’s the same dynamic as shouting all lives matter was back in the day. All lives Do matter, but that ain’t why you’re saying it right now. We see you. (edit the proverbial you, not talking about the guy I’m replying to)

      • rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It is funny to me. The comment about criminals on both side infer that the right has criminals. But I am used to idiots who ignore all my condemnation of trump and the right every time I criticize dems

        • dou9m@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Don’t take it too personally, we’re all pretty much on red alert because we don’t have a reliable information pipeline like we did in the 00s/10s for a little bit