• RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Isn’t it amazing when text is also not selectable? Like its rendered behind some other shit?

    I fucking hate websites ❤️

    • Mustakrakish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      Or when you try and select a letter and it auto selects the whole fucking work or sentence, jumping all over the place?

      • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I HATE that. I like to save things i read or find interesting in Joplin (open source notebook software) and it always has to be this giant fucking undertaking to copy some text off a website. I am annoyed just thinking about it… So i always end up just copying everything on the page instead. Don’t have time for that shit…

    • piecat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      The reddit mobile app has broken text selection. I did same thing as OP but with my stylus.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Like when someone makes an image of text? At least OP set alt text & linked to the source with real text: rare at lemmy.

  • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    My absolute biggest gripe about the failings of proper UI design is icons with no text attached.

    Floppy, okay surely the save button. Some book looking thing, no fucking clue. An eye in the middle of a square, what the fuck are you people doing???

    Having to hover over a weird looking icon to MAYBE gleam some sort of information on it takes so much longer than just having the fucking text below the God damn icon. Sometimes they don’t even have hover text! Thats GREAT UI skills there, Junior! Maybe you’ll get there eventually!

    Fucking idiots.

    • ne0phyte@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Massive +1. I can easily imagine complex 3D shapes in my head and freely manipulate them, but my brain works horrible when it comes to icons for some reason. I can’t intuitively find what I need, not even after months or years. Even after using something for a long time I will constantly hover over all icons to read the tooltips until I find what I need.

      The software I work on at work has a navigation at the top of just icons. I see it every day and I just can’t seem to associate the icons with the functionality.

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      The fucking Oblivion Remaster does this all over the UI!! So many vague icons with no text, especially in the magic UI.

      • LucidNightmare@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 days ago

        My favorite with Oblivion and similar games is, that’s a neat spell name, but what do the effects DO?!

        • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve played the old silver box DnD games from 1988 and 1989. The magic effects were listed in the clue book instead of the manual. Talk about purposefully asshole design

          • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            The Wizardry series of games were very DnD like, but they kind of made up a language for the spell names. You don’t get a fireball, you get Halito. A big fireball is Mahalito. So you need the manual spread across your legs just to know whether you need to cast porfic or calfo on the locked chest in front of you.

            They had more of a tolerance for bullshit back in the 80’s.

  • caseyweederman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    7 days ago

    I get unreasonably (okay, reasonably) upset when the simplest way to share an image is to take a screenshot of the image.

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Not at all unreasonable imho!

      My other favourite is screenshot > Google lens > select text …

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        I have to do this all of the time whenever anybody sends me a screenshot of their error message, rather than copying and pasting the error message into the ticket. Or worse still a photo of their screen that shows the error message.

    • Madrigal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      F12 > Network > Images > (select image) > Save Response As…

      Seems like a lot of steps, but you get the hang of it pretty quickly. And probably faster than cropping your screenshot, plus you get the original without any compression or other degradations.

  • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use a system at work that is 100% web based. I have 2 4k monitors in my desk. Why are the apps formatted for viewing on a phone? I’ve gotten to the point of hacking the CSS on every page just to make things usable.

    At the last version upgrade, the developers made some changes to the interface. They couldn’t be bothered to change the existing CSS, so they just put !important on all the new stuff.

        • zerofk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 days ago

          “What’s a desktop?”

          At the start of Covid, we had to start working from home. Our Chief Security Idiot thought that was a good time to impose measures that made it impossible to reboot a computer without physical access. When I questioned how that would work with my desktop, which stayed in the office building that I couldn’t legally access, he kept saying I had to take the “laptop” with me. I told him several times that it was a desktop, but he just couldn’t understand until my boss got involved.

          That was my first run-in with our idiot-in-charge-of-security, and it only got worse after that.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s kind of screwed to say. But a lot of people entering the work force grew up with phones and tablets as their main computer. It’s the mind set they have that everything uses touch interfaces.

      I’m not saying everyone or even most, but for a good portion it’s their default computer experience.

      • pseudo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The first generation was just that bad ignoring that some people wanted to browse the web through their mobile.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    Come to Japan where they like to make everything images instead. Can’t select it, can’t copy it, can’t translate it without a camera, can’t preview the text of something, is bad for accessibility, etc.

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    UI designer/developer here. One who works on features that facilitate reading.

    Based on their writing style and the text highlighting habit, this person is likely dyslexic. I’ve helped create functions that facilitate this behavior, which is better suited as a mode that can be enabled manually. There are browser extensions that can do this sort of thing for you. I’ve worked on a lot of assistive reading features.

    If this was set as a default behavior, most users would fucking riot. Most of them are using text highlighting for what this person doesn’t want to do.

    Edit - I think I need to emphasize that this is based on real data. A shit ton of it. These decisions aren’t made based on vibes. If the user base is performing a specific action repeatedly, we’re going to facilitate it. We can see what you all are doing. UI’s aren’t built around a bunch of conflicting edge cases based on anecdotes. If something performs a certain way, at least major applications, it’s usually because a lot of direct observations and metrics have strongly indicated that this is the preferred approach.

    Admittedly, sometimes business goals get in the way of that. But if those business goals we have to push get in the way of conversions, they get abandoned pretty quickly.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      (Apologies for my tone below, but this affects me also, and I dislike the notion that messing with how you normally select text is a niche desire)

      We don’t need any new functionality or a custom mode, we just want unexpected popups to not get in the way of expected behaviour when selecting text.

      As long as your options appear well above the text, and doesn’t cancel the highlighting, I can’t accept whatever you want to do. But as the OP writes, if it’s easy to misclick, this is bad UI design because it does not conform to the expectation that nothing will pop up. (Google Docs is the first example that comes to mind as implementing popup options totally fine, from recollection)

      If it’s too close to the selected text and causes misclicks, then I’m gonna be annoyed about this since the vast, vast majority (luckily) of text on the internet you can highlight to your heart’s content and nothing pops up.

      Just keep options decently above the highlighted text (I dunno what the right number is, 2 lines above the start of your selection? hey I’m not a UI designer)

      In conclusion, change is okay, but intuition is important.

      Tantacrul makes some great UI videos if you haven’t seen them before (not that I’m telling you how to suck eggs about your own profession, he’s just genuinely funny and interesting to watch)

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      lots of people do it, not just people with dyslexia. it helps keep track of where you are when there are large blocks of text. also it usually raises contrast so I’m sure that helps some people even more.

      • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        it helps keep track of where you are when there are large blocks of text

        So does the edge of the window & mouse pointer.

        also it usually raises contrast

        If the contrast sucks, then the UI is already broken. There are accessibility standards for

        If you’re selecting merely to read, there’s a good chance the text is too small, the lines too long without enough space, the contrast too low, and that would all be addressed by following common web accessibility standards. Good accessibility is good UI.

        16px is commonly considered a good minimum text size for accessibility. When I outgrew thinking tiny text was cool, I standardized interfaces to render at least that size & found a vast improvement.

    • wieson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I disagree.

      The mode for options is called the right mouse button and the mode for just highlighting is the left mouse button. One of the great pillars of UI design is conforming to expectations.

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      UI user here.

      A good rule of thumb for interfaces is “one action, one function.” Highlighting text and opening a context menu are two separate functions that should require separate actions (at least as default behavior, user configurability is also a good thing). If I highlight text, the only thing that should indicate is that I want the text highlighted. If I subsequently want a context menu, I will do the context menu action (right click, long press, etc). A UI should never be trying to predict what I want and it absolutely should not be doing things that I didn’t explicitly direct.

      You need sane defaults and having what is effectively a predefined macro is not a sane default.

    • metalsd@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think I agree with you. I usually select the text to do an action and the choices are useful. I don’t select for the better reading, if anything it’s just to highlight the text.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      We can see what you all are doing.

      No, you are seeing what the people too clueless to install tracking protection are doing.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Hard agree. I’m not dyslexic, but I also occasionally mark text to keep progress, especially if it’s a long piece. And if I really want to copy that text, I will, sometimes just out of spite that you’re trying to outsmart me, and I’m more likely to leave your site sooner too.

    Also, while we’re at it, can you please leave scrolling behaviour alone and not override it? I have a nice mouse that lets me scroll as fast or as slow as I want to. In some rare cases with a fancy UI where one wheel notch scrolls a whole page I agree that overriding the behaviour is warranted. In all other cases just FUCKING LEAVE SCROLLING AS IS (as handled by the OS and the browser) and don’t try to be fancy; if you try to be fancy for no particular reason, I’m more likely to leave your site ASAP rather than prefer it over other sites.

  • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    As someone who doesn’t do this, I can only guess it’s like holding your book mark parallel under the lines in a book as you read it, which I thought was fairly uncommon. Apparently a bunch of people read this way?

    • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      It makes more sense on monitors with large blocks of text or large paragraphs. With a monitor so big relative to a book, and scrolling making it easy to lose where you were, it can sometimes be tough for folks to read through huge chunks. Some people select chunks of text to help break up those monoliths into manageable bites along with putting a clear marker for where they are if they scroll or otherwise lose their place…

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        As someone who does occasionally do this, I don’t think it’s about readability. After all I also read books, which are not known for short bits of text in narrow columns. And I don’t use a bookmark, pen, or finger to keep track of where I’m at.

        I think it’s more about keeping your hand busy, subconsciously even. Although to be honest I also don’t do that while reading books.

        Maybe it’s a remnant of when every computer had a screensaver, and constantly moving the mouse meant keeping the screen alive.

        • mriormro@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          From a usability, accessibility, and comfort perspective a book is incredibly different from a device that’s blasting your eyeballs with highly contrasting light.

        • eronth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          For the screens I’m using, a book page is way narrower than the standard text region of a screen.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    The fact that I couldn’t select text on this post because it’s a completely unnecessary graphic kind of makes me hate you.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    I do this. It’s just a stimming thing while reading web articles and I hate being sent to Twitter or whatever for it.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do this because I do work on my computer and sometimes that work involves citing sources, copying and pasting sections of instructions, ensuring I’m using correct spelling of foreign names and words. And most importantly, copying and pasting wingdings and symbols that I can’t be bothered to memorize the numkey codes for. ™ 🄮℠

      I HATE UNSELECTABLE TEXT WITH A BURNING PASSION (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I do not want the program to react when I left click ordinary text. The program should not anticipate my needs. It should wait until I’ve told it I need something (with a right click) before doing anything.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m gonna break your heart then. Until about 15 years ago it used to be that literally all interactable/clickable text was both blue AND UNDERLINED to indicate it was a clickable link. Then some self-important designers with no user experience testing decided that was just too ugly and stopped underlining links to give it a “clean” minimalist look. It was then a trend, so everyone copied it. Now we still live with those consequences :(

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Kinda. Very specific edge case that can be solved with a custom feature like a browser extension.

  • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Teams is the worst offender. It constantly wants me to call any number. Social? Phone? Whatever. I don’t want to call anyone, and I sure as hell don’t want to do it via Teams.

    • Fillicia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Teams and discord on mobile. No I don’t want to copy the whole message dang it! Just let me select part of the text!

      I don’t understand what’s the end goal of this other than being frustrating. If they want a menu attached to a message we had the burger menu icon available for the best part of the last two decades.

  • Anas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    We went from using no punctuation to using too much. I struggled while reading this.

    • Hobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The no capitalization makes it hard for me. I think just re-writing with capitalization makes it a lot easier to read:

      Note to UI designers. When reading a long piece of text. I select the text while I read it. I select the text while I read it!. I select the text using my mouse. While I read the text I often select the text. I don’t want to perform actions on the text. I don’t want to accidentally click share link. I want to select the text while I read it.

      Here’s how I would mildly edit the punctuation in order to make it easier to read:

      Note to UI designers; when reading a long piece of text, I select the text while I read it. I select the text while I read it! I select the text using my mouse. While I read the text, I often select the text. I don’t want to perform actions on the text. I don’t want to accidentally click share link. I want to select the text while I read it.

      Here’s how I would have conveyed the thought in a JIRA comment:

      UI designers could you please, for the love of all mankind, stop fucking putting fucking shitty ass popups in the god damn non-mobile website! There is no one, and I mean no-fucking-body, that is still using a desktop computer in 2025 that does not know about ctrl-c and ctrl-v. There is not sane reason for you to ever assume a user wants to visit some shitty twitter/reddit/digg/blog when they select text on a desktop computer. If I see a single one of you motherfuckers putting fucking text inside an action I swear to god I will come down there and beat you to death with your own fucking keyboard.

  • ne0phyte@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    I do it, too. I rarely read any text without subconsciously marking the text while reading it. Might be a tool for me (ADHD) to make it easier not to lose track - I don’t know.

    But regardless of why people do it and while I agree that it’s probably something very specific not a lot of users do, I refuse to believe that anyone actually uses those select->popup-> share features, ever. Often the little pop-up even blocks the text above it which is just insanely bad UX imo.

    Sites should never mess with core functionality without asking (scrolling, selection, tab/keyboard navigation, hijacking common shortcuts/right click, clipboard, history, etc).

    I believe someone came up with that idea a decade+ ago and people just want it on their site to add value without actually checking if anyone uses it.